im having problem understanding how to create affidavit index for court apple as it get rejected by apple officer in family court W.A can you help me with template but it is not to court standards
Hi and good morning
i have created affidavit about 150 pages with evidence to support my appeal to family court of Western Australia
i have numbered pages 1 to 150
i have inserted annexure marked "A" to "T"
annexure (exsibits) marked "A" totaling of 9 pages consist of new evidence to support my case .
Each annexure holds new evidence that my partner have not disclosed to court . eg.. submitted to court forged documents sail of property ,my new evidence extract from land management office is the evidence that she was not bean honest to court .
annexure "B" New evidence that she had $120,000 in the bank when she arrived in to Australia and spend to renovating my house
under Annexure "B" is new evidence that she had Bank account held in her name with 120,000 but no evidence of using this account to wedrow money from neader she disclosed this in her financial statement .
requested by Mr T Kuurstra regional appeal registrar family court WA that i need to index may affidavit and tabulated .
I have used template from Appeal index's book but this was no good and rejected
! have you had experience in Appeal proceedings ?
2 haw you created evidence exhibits holding approximately 18 odd . difference new evidence to support appeal .
what i need is you to think how you are going to produce defenc affidavit holding all this evidenc and presented to court so judge can understand
I have failed Affidavit it was excepted , as large fail of 150 pages it was requested that i index affidavit i have used temple from index's appeal book but this was not correct
Good morning Leon
Yes i have created page numbers ,and i have created index reference to each annexe starts but not exceptionable
Annexe Evidence Date Page No.
" A" CBA Bank Statement"s 07/09/2008 36
" B" Photographs house before 2007 01/2007 38
" C" Bundle of photographs and Passport
Copy evidence to support difference 12/2006 57
"D" International student enrollment 05/2007 69
"E" United Credit Bank Statesmen evidence 04/2007 70
this haw i hew presented to F.C but not excepted
I just don't know the reason this holds crucial evidence weach my lawyer head in possession before trail newer used as in deference
My partner has not disclosed $71.000 in CBA bank ,evidence that she obtained dividend from house in germane in property settlement in 2007 but house did not belong to them in previous marriage the photographs and condition of my house before she arrived
All this exhibit is the evidence that she hew not spend $120,000
or renovated house and supported me from November 2007 to August 2008
if i cant use this evidence to support my deference i my asvel take my 9mm end blow my brains out it is just getting to complicated if i must sell house to pay her $ 89 ,000 i have no option and will not live on the streets as in 1990 i newer owned money on any of my assets during marriage or before ,
thanks for you time and effort to assist me
Thanks for Reply
yes im trying to appeal against order wich has bean granted to present new evidence in appeal trail scheduled 10 Feb 2015
May Lawyer at time of trail fail to submit evidence or used evidence to support my case hi haw not informed court of crosses examination neater was aloud to use evidence due to failing to comply.
Evidence that im using was in the applicant fail but the information was handed to as one day before court hearing about 180 pages
i have located evidence in applicant fail but newer submitter to court
that she had forged documents and fail to relive information of her bank account ,fabricated elegation about my house and back injures
fabricated elegation that i was on invalid pension that she was supporting me during marriage
I have not read section 79A i will thanks
is any simile trail appeal that you know that can be refereed to eg.
Case(s) referred to in judgement (s).
Beck&Beck (2) (1983) FLC 91-318
CCD&AGMD (2006) FamCA 1291
DD&D (2006)FCA 245
Stanford v stanford (2012)247 clr 108
this was used in original trail by her lawyer
this is just confusing
the honourabule justic Thackray have advised me to read and use as case guide but cant find and dont understend