Hello, my name is Ben and it is my pleasure to assist you with your question today. Do you have a specific question?
When was the tribunal decision by the way?
3 rd 4th of this month
What is the professional misconduct you are claiming?
regards to my case respondent IT expert has given an IT expert report as evidence against me, but respondent provided IT expert report was not sportive evidence and it was untruthful not only that person who pretended as an It expert he was not an IT expert.
ok but this is not professional misconduct, it is not a claim you can make against them for that, if there were issues with the contents of the statement it is something that should have been brought up at tribunal. Now that a decision has been made all you can do is consider appealing to the Appeals Tribunal but this is not easy. You can only appeal on an error of law (not the case here), no evidence to support finding of fact (possibly but it will be weak because there was evidence and if you did not agree with it then you should have challenged it at tribunal) or if the tribunal's decision was perverse (very rarely used).
As to the forged contract, this could be a criminal issue (perjury) but the police are unlikely to take this further unless it was a complaint made by a Judge, so you can bring this to the tribunal's attention and hope they agree and that they formally involve the police
last preliminary case heard on 26/09/13 at that hearing I provided my forensic expert report that time tribunal allowed to bundle and judge given chance to respondent to comment my expert report with orders but respondent didn't comply the orders after thee month later respondent requested from court to reply against my expert report and add a new expert evidence on 18/01/13, tribunal allowed ignoring the the orders after that my expert commented against new respondent IT expert report as it again false and flaws the statement. in the hearing day new judge said he is not consider My It expert report or other IT related evidence because he only consider whether internal process done or not correctly therefore judge wrong interpretation to give decision. previous judge clearly mention he needs to find truth of this expert report but it didn't happen
event internal process was totally different each other up to appeal example was investigation manager wrongly conducted the meeting and did not capture the all communication by respondent note taker and then i mentioned at disciplinary he conducted the meeting based on wrong It interpretation him self and untruthful IT expert report, then after that I went to Appeal he conducted the meeting how he wants and his own interpretation and his note taker has not written down what I said there for I and union rep didn't sign the notes.
my question is, if new judge only considering the internal process those three stages were completely diffidence and I haven't sign the notes of appeal meeting as it not truth what we spoke majorly even I didn't get all evidence up to appeal
in that case was that internal process acceptable to get conclusion and come to belief ?
ok I won't be able to continue with this query as it is getting more detailed than what we would normally deal with on here, especially considering the fee so I will open it up to other experts to deal with if they can. No need to respond - they have your information
Yes I am waiting some one to answer my questions at least employment I had discuss with your one of expert about criminal matter I am not satisfy at all the answer has given me,