Employment Lawyers Can Answer Your Employment Law Questions
Hello, my name is***** am a qualified lawyer and I will be assisting you with your question today.
Were you an employee or self employee and what do they believe this temporary nature was considering it has been going on for such a long time? Please note I'm in court so may not be able to reply immediately thanks
Thank you. Something which has lasted for 20 years is clearly not temporary, so even though this may have been the initial intention, the fact that it has carried on for such a long time would almost certainly mean that you had eventually become permanent. Still, even if you were not permanent that does not mean you get treated differently. Redundancy depends on how long your continuous service with an employer is, requiring 2 years at least to qualify. Therefore, even if you were considered a temporary employee, if you had been retained by them and worked continuously for over 2 years, if they eventually seek to terminate you because you are no longer required, you would still be entitled to redundancy.
You can therefore certainly take this further if necessary and pursue them for redundancy. Because they say you are no longer required, that is indeed likely to amount to a redundancy, and with more than 2 years’ continuous service behind you, you would be entitled to a redundancy payment on termination.
Please take a quick second to leave a positive rating for the service so far by selecting 3, 4 or 5 stars above. I can continue answering follow up questions and in particular can also discuss the options you have on taking this further. There is no extra cost for this - leaving your rating now will not close the question and means we can still continue this discussion. Thank you
no problem get back to me if needed