How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Ben Jones Your Own Question
Ben Jones
Ben Jones, UK Lawyer
Category: Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 49453
Experience:  Qualified Employment Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
29905560
Type Your Employment Law Question Here...
Ben Jones is online now

Is Toil (time off in lieu) classified as Salary Sacrifice as

This answer was rated:

Is Toil (time off in lieu) classified as Salary Sacrifice as our company after 10 years of allowing us to bank overtime hours and take additional days off instead of money payment have stopped this practiceThe company have said it's salary sacrifice and do not allow this practiceI have checked the Gov.Uk website and all it said was TOIL is allowed as long as their is a written agreement between Employer and Employee

Hello, my name is***** am a qualified lawyer and I will be assisting you with your question today.

There is nothing specific in law which states that TOIL is treated as salary sacrifice and cannot be allowed to operate. Whilst not as common as it used to be, TOIL is still used by some employers and it is legal. You are correct that no specific laws deal with it hence why it is usually something which is agreed between the employer through a specific agreement, or through custom and practice.

If there is nothing specific in writing in your case then it is most likely going to be an implied contractual term. There is a principle in law known as ‘custom and practice’, under which certain terms may become implied into an employment contract. This makes them contractually binding even if they are not written down anywhere. This area of law is rather complex and it is usually only down to the tribunals to establish with certainty if something had become an implied term. Nevertheless, it does not prevent employees from directly raising this argument with their employers in any negotiations.

From a legal perspective, to become an implied term a practice must be "reasonable, notorious and certain". In simpler terms this means it must be well established over a period of time, known to employees and clear and unambiguous. So it would need to have been clearly communicated to staff so that they have a degree of expectation for it and then it must have been consistently applied for a substantial period of time. Therefore, something that is uncertain, not widely communicated or applied consistently or has just been around for a few months is unlikely to qualify.

Case law has suggested that the following are important factors when considering whether a term has become implied into a contract:

· On how many occasions, and over how long a period, the terms in question have been applied - the more times they have been applied and the longer the period over which this has occurred, the stronger the argument they had become implied into the contract

· Whether the terms are always the same - large differences will make the argument they had become implied weaker

· The extent to which the terms are publicised generally - there must be widespread knowledge and understanding amongst the workforce that such terms were being applied

Whilst the argument of custom and practice can be raised with the employer in negotiations, they could of course refuse to accept it and if that is the case it can only realistically be challenged by taking this to an employment tribunal. Before that option is pursued it may also be worth raising a formal grievance to give the employer one last chance to resolve this internally.

I trust this has answered your query. Please take a second to leave a positive rating by selecting 3, 4 or 5 stars above - this is an important part of our process and recognises the time I have spent assisting you. If you still need me to clarify anything else, please reply on here and I will assist as best as I can. Thank you

Hello, I see you have read my response to your query. Could you please let me know if it has answered your original question? You can either reply on here with a quick ‘Yes, thanks’, or select 3, 4 or 5 stars on this page. I can still answer follow up questions if needed to clarify anything for you. Many thanks

Customer: replied 1 month ago.
Ben
Thanks for your help it is a very useful and in depth explanation
Could you send the information to my email address please***@******.***
Rate is 5 Stars

hi there, unfortunately we cannot email customers directly but this answer is saved in your account here and you can also copy and paste it to save as you wish on your computer

Ben Jones and other Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you