REMO said basically the delay was nothing to do with them, they sent everything as they should have done and they cant help with arrears as theyre just a transmitting body and dont deal with specifics of the case
The advocate said arrears are only accrued from the date the order ks registered in Guernsey.
He doesnt have assets here, but he is employed by a Uk company
he works for waitrose in Guernsey, head office is in bracknell and he is paid from there. no mainland bank account. tried csa first of all but was told that they couldn't act as he doesn't have ties to the uk, his employment isnt sufficient
he works for waitrose in Guernsey, head office is in Bracknell and he is paid from there. no mainland bank account. tried csa first of all but was told that they couldn't act as he has no ties to the uk, his employment isn't sufficient
not that im aware of
it was sent promptly, have confirmation to that effect from REMO. when I contacted the court in Guernsey they then tracked it down
thats the impression I got yes. First of all I was told they hadnt received it then the next time I chased it they had no record on their system but later managed to track it down
payment due of 220 per month, first to be paid by October 2012 so its been 9 montjs, £1980 in arrears to date
he wasnt. he also didn't return any documents or provide any defence or statement of earnings etc., and didn't attend the hearing in guernswy either
so Guernsey are able to change the terms of the original order? ive not been given any info re how/ when payments are to be made etc so am still completely in the dark!
ok so while arrears may not be enforceable as part of the order, do I have grounds to file a petty debt claim against my ex for any payments not made to date, is that an option?
but a petty debt claim made at the royal court in guernsey for money owed would be considered completely separately to enforcement of a maintenance order surely?
I think I'll give it a try...technically he owes me money from the date of the original ruling, Guernsey havent disputed that but are just unable to enforce it under the maintenance order