By judge on November 12th 2013
He ended up as LIP as he could no longer afford a legal rep unlike her who created a legal bill over £40k and she has been allowed to use the endowment to pay it off. He has been left with his legal bill to pay, costs from the court and his existing credit cards debts which came about because she was getting £500 per month too much in Child Maintenance. Only when the CSA got involved because she contacted them demanding more did it transpire that she had been overpaid over £12k, all of which she gets to keep.
There is equity in the property of around £200k after the mortgage is deducted.
The twins are autistic but otherwise physically lovely, healthy and strong boys. The eldest is fine.
Married from Aug 2000 to separation Sep 2009, Decree Nisi May 2010
Bought the home in May 2004, had been living in his flat in Docklands which went as a whole payment towards the new Barrett home. She had previously owned her own flat, sold it and moved into his six months b4 the marriage. She put some of the proceeds to the new house, about a third of what he contributed. £7k of her profit has never been accounted for. She also continued with the endowment on her flat, didn't tell him and has been allowed to keep it all as well as the total house contents, a £20k car which she bought shortly after she kicked him out of his home.
She has savings accounts with several thousand in them, an equity plan for when her parents die yet she claims she has been put out of their will recently...no reason given and judge ignored this too.
Her debts were the legal bill, two thirds of which were run up about lack of contact with his kids...she changed phone numbers, emails, the locks on the house, even the childminder to stop him having contact for the last 18 months with no grounds as they have joint parental responsibility. She has even threatened hospital staff that if dad attended one of the boy's appointments she would refuse to let him be examined!
he takes home £4,300 per month and has to give her 25% csa.She takes home £3,800 pm plus the £1000k csa, DLA, Child benefit and direct payments...her total declared income after all deductions is just under £6k per month. she is eligible to go for Clinical excellence awards but so far hasn't to keep her income artificially lower...when she applies for them(after the Absolute) she will earn approx. another £9k pa.
We have also found out that the person she has moved into the family home under the guise of Boys' carer) is in fact her lesbian partner!...no doubt why she has prevented him seeing the boys as may have found out sooner.
He has no assets at all and his debts are...£20k credit cards, £5k overdraft at it's limit, £4.5k for his previous solicitor, £5k costs. he will also have to pay towards the pension sharing order...money he hasn't got. As a result he is in an impossible position with regard to going for a Contact Order to see the kids.
Married from Aug 2000 til separation 26 Sep 2009. Decree nisi may 2010.
His only asset was the house and a 2005 Ford Focus. His debts: £20k credit cards, £5k overdraft, £4.5k legal fees for previos legal representation approx £5k extra costs from court.
Her assets: house, endowement policy worth £32k, £20k car, savings accounts with several thousand pounds in them. Equity plan for 'when her parents die to cover death duties' yet she claimed on oath she has been put out of her parents' will recently!!
The house has equity of £200k after the mortage is taken off.
Her debt is her legal bill which has run up to £41k as she was advised not to go to Mediation and two third of the bill is as a result of her refusal to allow him to see or speak to his boys despite having joint parental responsibility. he has not seen his kids for over 18 months.
His income is net £4,300.pm left with £3200 after csa payment
Her income is net £5600 pm, salary of £3800 net, £1100 csa, £600 DLA. She did not declare Child benefit or Direct Payments from Kent Social Services and when asked on oath tried to wriggle out of answering the question. The judge did not press her for the truth!
He has to pay some of her costs...she has been given the endowment which would be a joint marital asset to pay off hers..he has been given nothing.
She has got 100% of the house and 14.3% of his NHS pension although the actuary said 6.8% was needed to balance the pensions age 60. Nothing was taken into account if he retired at 55...he is 55 on 7/12/13...nor the fact that despite her large current income, she is 8 years younger and is only working 3 days per week at the moment and has the capacity to work 5 days a week plus clinical excellence awards.
She also got to keep all of her savings accounts, house contents, expensive car and equity plans.
He was ordered to pay costs for the adjournment in April 2013 as the Actuary report was delayed as he had been asking for two reports to reflect his at age 60 and also at 55 as he may have to take early retirement. Her team flatly refused this and the court imposed costs on him. Thee Actuary said he was happy to do a second report at no extra cost!
He has also been ordered to pay the costs for the Decree Nisi.