the house is worth 160,000 and there is 140,000 outstanding on the mortgage.
other assets car - mine
I have 40,000 a year . don't know what he has
75,000 and yes I would start divorce proceedings
My concern is that he has already had his share of the equity from the house and should have been reasonable by agreeing to state this. He would not and so I was left in a position where if I sold the house he would demand half of what ever equity was in it despite the fact that he was not entitled to it. I therefore did not do this. Since the split I have paid out of my bank account extra funds to pay off the house and I am continuing to do so. Now I have a third party who could place a charge on the house or force me to sell or I would have to negotiate with the receiver as an alternative. This I feel is unfair as 1. He has had his money. 2. He had never paid a bean. 3. Refused to give me something to say he has had his equity. I know in law that because his name is XXXXX XXXXX debt he is jointly responsible for this and also is entitled to half the equity but he has had his half!
I can prove that he has had the money.
I need an urgent answer to this Clare if possible. Let me know if you need anything else.
That's welcome information and gives me something to go on. Thank you for getting back to me Clare.