Due to the gross negligence of my solicitors to validate that the evidence
produced by my x was in fact invalid. He would not have been able to make an Appeal to pay me a residual amount for any indemnity against any liabilities as he would have been seen to be FULLY LIABLE.
If he was FULLY LIABLE then I should have been FULLY COVERED
and not by a residual amount but by a Full amount.
As he was utilising documents that were invalid since 2003 for all
purposes loan Guarantees. This placed me at risk and jeopardy.
There were extra costs to me in the divorce, the Judgement was
based on assertions of the documents being valid and the assets
were distributed on the basis that the documents were valid
when they were not valid at all.
This evidence has now caused a Domino effect to other parts
of the Order.
During the divorce I asked for a fighting fund non was given.
I should have been given a fighting for the following reason
that if the documents were invalid how could I defend my self
against the bank in a foreign Jurisdiction with no money and
seeing as the documents were invalid.
Had the Judge been given conclusive confirmation by my solicitors
that the documents were invalid and in writing from the High Commission
as I now have she would have given me a fighting fund as part of the
existing Order but this did not happen as my solicitors did not act
in best interest and left the Judge to make assertions.
This means any money that I have been given for family needs
is now going to swept away with lengthy legal battles abroad
therefore how have my family needs now been met?
A piece of land that I was entitled to receive half is now being
sold to repay all the bank for loans that did not apply to me as the documents were invalid.
My x who took the loan money has spent it and will not say
where it has gone. Part of this money has gone to his offshore
Why should I have had to subsides these loans from share
of the matrimonial settlement ? when I was a victim of deceit.
If the bank should take this further as the money that they require
is more than the asset being sold them my inherited lands
which the Judge said I should keep may be at risk and jeopardy
if the bank foreclose to retrieve the loans or they will repossess
the land which I have bee given by way of 51% share by the court.
In effect I would have not got any thing from a division of assets
abroad based on invalid documents.
How am I going to live as my family needs would not have bee met.
There was supposed to be kept back an amount for indemnity
against the former matrimonial home however at this time there
is no money being kept back. He has placed his legal fees on the
property, when he has other business.
My argument on this is that his legal fees should now be lifted
and for this amount £300,000 to be given to me as a fighting fund
and cover for any liabilities he has caused me by his actions that
have repercussions and financial ramifications to me personally.
He as the chargor of his legal fees placed on the home should now
forfeit his right due to his conduct as he and his solicitors presented
documents that were in fact invalid to divert the course of justice
which undermined the Judge's decision of the Order.
Needles to say that this case could have ended in 2010 and I would
now be writing this letter. As if my solicitors had acted correctly
He would not have been left in control of the joint assests to
dissipate,devalue, and default on the joint assets ad I would have
been given a fighting fund.
It aslo goes without saying that there are repercussions not limited
to just the guarantee therefore 4 years of extra litigation ....
Appeal - enforcement hearing costs - and other legal costs which
I have incurred when I should not have incurred this costs
Now I have to make an application for a Reversal of the Appeal
court Judgement for FULL INDEMNITY against their decision
for a residual amount for my PROTECTION as I am a risk and jeopardy
to amounts of money that are not all known at this time and as there-is no money being kept back for this.
All this has happened by the inept behaviour of my solicitors to do their
job to start with as only now can it be seen when I try to implement parts of the order which make it impossible for me to do as I am not liable
and it was based on that I was liable.
Util I complained they kept saying my case was over and have
left me to fed for myself which is unjust and fair to further loss of my settlement and family needs until eventually all my funds will run out.
When my x has other businesses to rely upon with a steady stream of income for the rest of his life but I was reliant on these divorce proceedings for my future security and have no stream of income
and have reached a pensionable age. He has ruined my credit rating by his defaults on the former matrimonial home because he was left in control even though his income and expenditure do no match his current
lifestyle and which were disputed to be inconsistent.
He has caused me all sorts of problems that he would have been in
a position to do had the evidence been validated during the proceedings
once and for all in 2010.
Therefore are immense spin offs by his actions
So it therefore most important that the issue of my question
is answered even in general terms .