I had exparte orders against my husband in July 2014 (non mol, occupation, child arrangments and PSO) whch were then converted to undertakings outside the court and the child arrangments orders were changed to shared residence under pressure that I wil only be allowed to stay in matrimonial home provided I give consent for shared residence and childs week to be split to 50/50. I completely resented this but unfortunately due to money constraints had to agree and the weekly split arrangement started on 25/02. I am still not convinced this is in the best interest of the child and want to start a new case to discharge the orders regarding the live with order and 50/50 split of the week. The child is girl cild in full time education five years of age and is completely confused with this arrangment.Will my case stand any ground knowing it has only been converted to shared residence in Jan 2015 by consent. The child lived with me for 6 months with supervised contact to father for 3 months and then unsupervised contacts for 2 months before 50/50 split of the week started on 25/02.
223 pattern for child care
mon tue mum
Wes thu dad
Fri sat dum mum
Mon tue dad
Wed thu mum
Fru sat sun dad
That is why i dont agree to any such pattern of 5050.Father wanted exactly half half this seemed to give max overlap and due to proximity in houses just started this so that child is only away from each parent for two nights only. He wants not one hour less than what i get.
I wouod prefer school days with me and alterbate eeekends with him. Is that unreasonable
No i havenot checjed but the child told me she does not like it and feels confused. She wants to stay with me in school days and visit dad one day