Thanks. Please see below the main questions from the online partner application form and the answers that have been given. To some of them it is impossible to answer n/a as the online application will not allow you to proceed forward.
1. What job or employment is the main applicant doing in the UK or going to do in the UK? Answer: Investor
2. Name of company where the main applicant is working/will work? Answer: Investor
3. When did/will the main applicant begin their job (date required)? Answer: 5 June 2013 (provisional date for arrival in the UK)
4. When is the job expected to finish (date required)? 5 June 2018 (in accordance with the 5 year period required for ILR)
Questions about the finances of the partner:
1. Are you employed/self employed/unemployed (n/a is not an option)? Answer: unemployed
2. Do you receive income from any other sources including friends and family (n/a is not an option)? Answer: Yes
3. Do you have savings, properties or other income for example from stocks and shares (n/a is not an option)? Answer: No
4. How much of your monthly income is used to support your family members (must be a number)? Answer: GBP3000
5. How much do you spend each month on living costs (must be a number)? Answer: GBP2000
6. You stated that you receive income from other sources including friends or family.Please provide details. Answer: Supported by the main applicant
7. Are there sufficient funds to support you (n/a is not an option)? Answer: Yes
8. Please state the amount of money available and total number of defendants. Could probably put n/a but is that appropriate?
If UKBA do not want partners of Tier 1 Investor applicants answering these questions, why have they not provided for N/A optionality? Do you think the above responses are in line with what they expect to see? Will there be problems for the applicant because information has been included (through no other choice)? Could it be that UKBA are concerned to make sure that dependents have sufficient funds beyond the £1m which the main applicant is required to invest? If they do not require evidence of support, how do they get comfortable with sufficiency of funds? Thanks