I believe he might be willing to negotiate, but I can't foresee him going less than 2 grand, which I'm not willing to do. His leaving the company means that my startup capital is now halved, and I cannot afford to buy him out for the amount he has requested.
Please refer to his last correspondence below:
hmmm, we need to work something out. I am not willing to sell my half for 1k, I think its just too little for what it is. Although we have spent 6k between us so far, what we have for that money is worth so much more than what we have spent. That is that the company now owns more that 6k's worth of assets, half of which would therefore be mine. You did say in your original email that you would buy me out for what I have spent so far, part of my thinking was relying on that being the case. To pay 3k and then own absolutely everything, all code, all artworks, the copyrights, the domains, the entire company and game ....it is a very good deal. It puts you in a strong position going forwards. You will have a product in a state which it can be taken directly to an agency and produced into a game. That is a serious proposition. I appreciate you dont want to risk more than 1k but without a bigger offer, the whole project could be at risk. It's probably more useful to consider how much the project actually means to you as well as me before we agree costs. I'm pretty sure you wouldn't sell your side for 1k. I really think the fairest way to do it is to cover the money I have put in and draw a line under it. It is the simplest figure involved, I could obviously make the case that I have put in a lot of time and expertise into this for two years also but I'm not asking anything for that. Can you take a bit of time to think about it and get back to me with some more thoughts on a price. I am happy to discuss further.
And from my original email which he refers to:
Ofcourse if you no longer wish to finance the project, there are other options - I could buy you out for the amount you've spent so far for example - but there's no way this thing would be as awesome as it is now without you, and I want you with me every step of the way.
Although I did mention buying him out for his spend in that email, I merely suggested it as a possible option. At the time of writing this above email, I was not aware he wanted out of the company.
Remember that what another problem you faceis that if you cannot come to an accommodation with him and you carry on withthis company, if ever it takes off good style, you will end up paying a lotmore to get rid of him.
Unless there is an agreement to the contrary,all assets and copyright vest in the company and if the company went intoliquidation, they would be sold on the open market and you may be biddingagainst him. But in any event, you would be buying the assets off theliquidator and there could be quite a big hiatus (costly) during which youcould not trade using the company assets.
You have offered £1000 and he has spent 3000.You think he would probably settle for 2000.
You are therefore only £1000 adrift and itdepends what it is worth to you to put the whole thing behind you. £1500?
In cases like this, I never suggest making anoffer. I suggest sending a cheque. Armed with a cheque in the hand for some ofthe amount they want, compared to an argument over the whole of the amount,(and arguments. They may win or lose) the cheque in the hand is a prettypowerful incentive to accept it.
So consider deciding how much you would liketo pay the (you need to make it attractive enough) and send it with a coveringletter headed "without prejudice save as to costs". That means that they cannotproduce the letter in court as any proof that you admit owing them any money atall.
Tell them in the letter that you are offeringthis money in full and final settlement of all claims against you, past,present and future, and that by cashing it they accept it as such. Tell themthat if they do not accept it, they should return the cheque to you and if theyissue legal proceedings, you will defend them on the basis of A, B, C,whatever.
Tell them that if they do not understand thesignificance of the letter. They should take independent legal advice.
I can tell you this approach works nine timesout of 10, provided the offer is reasonable and not derisory.
For legal reasons which I will not boreyou with but which go back several hundred years, the cheque must not come fromyou, but was come from a third party, friend, relative, solicitor, ouraccountant, neighbour, girlfriend, wife, husband, whoever, just not from you.
Can I help further?
Please bear with me today because Iwill be online and off-line with clients and other users and travelling
Please don't forget to positively ratemy answer service (even if it was not what you wanted to hear) and I willfollow up any further points you raise for free. If you don't rate itpositively, then the site keep your deposit and I get 0 for my time. If inratings you feel that you expected more or it only helped a little, please askme for further info before rating me negatively otherwise I don't get paid atall for my time and answer. The thread remains open.