My condolences for your loss..It is always difficult my Auntie died on the 1st of april and it will take a long time to come to terms if ever I still havn't with my Mother.
So a pest like me doesn't help but may keep you occupied ...
Thats good news re the power but I would like to know that as his argument is ...... that it was an implied term of all agreements between myself and Fagerland that High Barn would be marketed for sale and sold within a reasonable time
That was not the case at all. I put High Barn on the market rental and sale with same agent ( sorry spoke to estate agent I thought we only had rental )with total agreement with Fagerland But we both preferred my investment to fractify He had no problem with me letting HB.
Fagerland was living with me until 28th feb 2012 He moved out because I had let the property and we did not want to marry.
The understanding was always long term and never at his behest.
As I wrote this morning I have 11 months of correspondence between Fagerland and I march 2012 jan 2013 concerning the 'investment' and at no time did he ever ask about HB being put on the market or request it should be in fact asked if I was going back to live there in april 2014 He offered for me to buy the agreement for £5000.00 but I did not and still do not have that kind of money.
Surely this correspondence negates Isaac 'implied term of agreement'?
Jolly well hope so.....
Isaac also states I am in breach as no payments have been made and I have not provided an assessment of my income.
He is the only one to have asked for the above....and I deny that I owe him a bean and that he is bound by the agreement... so I guess that will only arise at the hearing.
Thank you for the link.....
What does the mediator do ? Does his/her advice hold with the court ?
Isaac wants a meeting with me without prejudice what do you think ? My instinct tells me no but ......
The court posted me his directions arrived today but I still have until the 3rd May to reply? please confirm as Isaaac emailed again to push for meeting warbling on about 'must be seen to mediate'
Can the court deny me a hearing ? Just because his directions say
any party not engaging in any such means proposed by another must serve witness statement giving reasons within 21 days of that proposal, such witness statement must not be shown to the judge until questions of cost arise
Do I have to comply?
( I could stab this creep ......... but however 'daft' the law can be I can't see it agreeing to some guy off the street that has not paid me a penny putting my house up for sale........that would be what the final outcome would be because I have no money ..... I lost it in the investment and it is unlikely to be recovered....... This was a personal agreement only made to get Fagerland off my back I do intend to repay him one day not that he deserves it What do you think ?)
I know this is lengthy but it would put my mind to rest and I do need to rethink the directions ( did you receive my download of other information ? you did not say )
Please take your time I dont want to cause you any more grief
But I would be very grateful for you to answer all of my questions.
even if some answers may well be ball park ( taking into account the law is not straight forward )