Company has changed the name from, lets say from A to B in November 2012 (when company A is searched on the Companies House register, it comes up with new name, B, but states that previous name is A) but Charity stayed called A until two weeks ago, when its de-registered with the Charity Commission. Company B is not a charity, a community group.
So, am I correct to think that company B is responsible for the debts of company/charity A, because its registered with the Companies House under the same number, address, directors etc? Is the fact that charity A no longer exists means that B (in essence, the very same entity) doesnt have to pay us the money they owe? Can we take B to court to recover our money?
The initial agreement was with charity/company A, so was all the correspondence. However, last reminder we sent (10 days ago) was in the name of the company B, requesting payment based on the fact that they are, in fact, the same entity. I dont expect them to pay - they have tried to avoid paying us in every possible way. My Trustees have instructed me to take B to court, which is why Im trying to find out little bit more.
Thank you, thats exactly what I needed to know!