I explained!!! I was recently convicted of harrassment against my neighbours. My neighbours lied. I have avideo recording of the neighbours son threatening me and being abusive to me. In his police statement and his claims to the court, he lied. When asked to explain the discrepancy between his evidence and the video, he said 'he must have edited the video'. Th court believed him but, I assure you, I did not edit the video. I have the origninal memory card and a co puet expert will show that I did nit edit the video. I said this to the Magistrates. Depsite this, the magistartes decided I wa scapable of editing videos (which I am not) and convicted me. I amfurios and distressed. I now have a suspended prsuon sentence largely based upon lies by the major witness against me.
he does nor realise that I was already recording him with my video camera in my top pocket, already turned on. He thinks I strted recording him when I produced the camera in frontot of hi. His claim to the police and court is that I 'gthreatened him cried on a recycle bin( I do not even have a recyle bin), swore at him for 2 minutes and so on. None of this is on the video. he claimed in courst that I must have edidetd out hese bits. It is not true. I have no ability to edit videos. I have the original Me3mory card and any co puet expert will say it was not editede. I am furious with the ignorant magistrated concluding the he told the truth and that I was capable of editing videos. Please note, his stsrer is a police officer Nad I belive has had unfair influence.
I wish to proceed. he lie to the court and. It is a serious crime - perjury. can you help?