Next door built a "bungalow" at bottom of their 70' garden, no planning needed as within allowed and called it a shed. Built extension from back of house, withing no planning needed. Now have peole living in erection at bottom of garden with electric, water, sewage tapped from main house and ut in planning to build conservatory on back of main house and not mention what there - planning put in in wife's name who not on deeds that own
Please let me confirm thefacts. These people own the house and have, without planning permission, builtsome kind of property in the bottom of their garden which they are letting outand have taken services from the house.
They are now building aconservatory which they have applied for planning permission would have made nomention of the other building at the bottom of the garden.
Is that the situation? If not,please clarify
Built at bottom (bungalow)1st within just allowed no permission needed.
Built extension on back of house, again within allowed, no permission needed.
Erection of full width of garden at bottom is now lived in ( bungalow) and services taken from main house.
Retrospective planning gone in for plastic extension, mostly built, attached to extension of main house and called conservatory!!
Plans gone in are showing attached to main house and full garden still there. Apart from fact most of garden is built over and causing flooding, they're lying and putting application in as a resident in house, not owner -- that apart, building regs of letting in garden. do normal landlord laws apply?
Are you in USA?
The site is hosted in USA but Iam in Chester.
I don't understand thereference to landlord.
What do you want to know aboutthis?