This is remarkably suspicious, the evidence having been nicked!
I know how cats C and D work. I have bought a couple of motor bikes on same basis. Provided you didn’t misrepresent the car, I cannot see that they have a claim.
I would be off to court.
Even if they win the worst that can happen is that you pay up.
Assuming that the car was total junk..(and you sed it was excellent apart from cat C) they had control of it and they are under duty to take care of it. They didn’t do that. They should claim on their insurance and their loss is the difference between what the value (not what the insurance co pays out) and what they paid.
If they claim on their insurance and the insurance co says they will give what they paid, I cannot see what they are claiming for.
If you tell me the substance of their claim I can expand my answer, but I would be off to court based on the facts so far.
I think that their legal adviser should read some more law books or go back to law school BASED ON THESE FACTS
Please bera with me over weeknd as I am on and offline. Thanks
Does that answer the question? I am happy to answer specific points.
Can I help further?
Please don't forget to positively rate my answer service (even if it was not what you wanted to hear).
If you don't rate it positively, then the site keep your deposit and I get 0 for my time. It is imperative that you give my answer a positive rating.
It doesn’t give me, “a pat on the head”, “good boy” (like ebay), it is my livelihood!
If in ratings you feel that you expected more or it only helped a little, please ask.
I am offline shortly until later and will pick this up then if needed.
Please bear with me each day and over weekends because I will be online and off-line each day.
Don’t worry if you get a message saying “Rate to Finish'. The thread does not close or finish after rating and we can continue this exchange if you wish