Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
I do not understand your question "have you obtained a full copy of your file"
NO- they will not answer my letters- where do I go from here?
Your response of no value - I am NOT interested in child benefit - The question is were they in education following their sixteenth birthday as defined in section 55 of the act in operation in years 2006 & 2007. Their disclosure to the ombudsman shows that one d.o.b.19.11.1990 was in education Sept/6 October 2008 - so where was she in years 2006 & 2007 and other d.o.b.13.11 1991 was in education Sept 2008/July 2009 & Sept 2009/March 2010 - so where was she in year 2007. The ombudsman says ICE made a full investigation and will not persue and ICE will not address my question where were they - Note viz ICE CSA have awarded me 2x £50.00 compensation because they failed to answer.
The law changed in 2009 when child benefit was the decider - I am referring to section 55 as applied in 2006 & 2007 & that question neither CSA or ICE will address and neither CSA in letters addressed to Chief Executive sent by recorded mail will respond to. Please refer me to "one of the little facts about about how the CSA work" where is that written in law and why will the CSA disclose which court issued an order against me?
CSA letter dated 02.12.2011 reads "We are applying to a court for a liability order against you Amount £1246.68 and same office letter dated 18.05.2012 reads " We are taking bailiff action against you. A liability order has bee granted against you" amount £967 68 but they will not disclose which court. In August 7 2013 they issued an earnings order against me for £967.68 Note NO other messages from CSA between those days despite my letters challenging their order repeating where were the girls in 2006/7 and the other in 2007 They will NOT address the issue and neither will ICE
NO - was not advised of any application to court so that I could challenge their request - also they have ignored my request to refer my challenge to a tribunal - how come they refer to 2 different amounts - I ask how efficient they are.
Hi & thanks. NO I accept that they will not give me the school and that does not concern me. After about 18 months of letter writing in 2009 they said we will contact the college for their attendance record & WILL ADVISE YOU- but they never did- but they did advise ICE & Ombudsman. - Ombudsman advised my MP of their attendance which clearly shows as I said one was not in education years 2006 & 2007 but attended for 5/6 weeks in Sept 2008 and the other shows she was not in education following her sixteenth birthday in 2007 but went in for nearly 2 years from Sept 2008 . What I am seeking is how to get CSAto answer which court did they get the liability orders and can I apply to that court to challenge their order. It should be noted that initial years up to their sixteenth birthdays they had issued orders for deduction viz my employers and were paid, but for some reason this stopped, and why did they resort to court orders and finally last month they issued an employer order for 2 payments to cover so called arrears. Solicitors used I was not after a year happy with their efforts and discharged them as I could no longer afford their fees, as at Easter I had a heart attack was admitted to Frimley hospital and at present am off sick with a question when I will be fit to return to work. Thanks
Hi- me again - The eldest d.o.b.19.11.1990 was sixteen in 2006 end of compulsory education and by the disclosure to the Ombudsman by csa from disclosure by the college of her attendance was not in education then until Sept/6 October 2008 & only for 4/5 weeks so I maintain she was not in education as per Section 55 of the child act 1991 as in law in 2006 and the youngest d.o.b. 13.11.1991 was sixteen in 2007 end of compulsory education and by the college declaration to CSA was not then in education until Sept 2008/July 2009 & Sept 2009/March 2010- so again I maintain she was not in education as covered re child maintenance as per section 55 of the 1991 child act as in force in 2007. As you know before the child sixteen birthday you get an enquiry as to their future education is to continue so child benefits continue, but it should be borne in mind that you have a responsibility to advise the authority of any changes, so I question did this take place, and as perhaps child benefit was paid until they were eighteen and perhaps this was so CSA says claim valid. My problem is who can I get to answer was child maintenance payable as per the Act when it is clear by the disclosure by CSA to the ombudsman one was not in education years 2006 & 2007 and the other was not in education year 2007 What right have I to get details of the court liability orders so perhaps I can get answers that way. Thanks