Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
We reinstated contact on a supervised basis last week on condition the child slept at the fathers parents home and the father went back to his place. He was supposed to have contact again this weekend but we have decided to block it again in full. We have applied to the Court for an urgent review (mid Jan I think) and he has applied for full residence and reinstatement of unsupervised order. The child porn was documented in the allegations for the original factfinding and has been mentioned to the judge twice. However the fact finding was cancelled as a senior barrister negotiated an agreed way forward for supervised access until she is eight. The solicitors for the father saw the order as agreed, didn;t like it and went back to the Court in front of a different judge to have it killed off. We then applied to reinstate the fact-finding and it was refused. As you must be aware the whole thing is in favour of the father,