How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jo C. Your Own Question

Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 31300
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

i have to write a letter to the client (claimant) explaining

Customer Question

i have to write a letter to the client (claimant) explaining the outcome of the telephone conversation. It should be set out: -the fact that liability and contributory negligence still have to be decided (Both solicitors during the negotiation have decided they will not discuss this at this stage) -what concession has been made by the Defendant on causation (this is kind of what i wrote: At the beginning, in respect of causation,(defendant plc) were arguing that the accident did not cause injury you sustained. They relied on their expert’s (Dr m..) opinion. Their medical evidence revealed that the symptoms you suffered are not attributable to the accident. Mr W (defendant's solicitor) was arguing that you already had the degenerative condition. His assumption was based on the fact that you have attended three previous visits at your GP, complaining of a stiff neck. However our medical expert, Dr ...suggested that your degenerative condition was present, but symptom-free at the time of the accident, which supported a finding that the accident worsened a pre-existing condition. After debating on the accelerationboth solicitors came to conclusion that they can settle this matter if you would be willing to accept the reduction to eighteen months acceleration period. ( so they have reduced acceleration point from 3 years to 18 months) and concede causation point. -the outcome of the negotiation on damages and why the proposal is good one: (a) With regard to the question of damages both solicitors had submitted to settle the general damages aspect of this claim in the sum of £5,350. b) Regarding the claim for special damages that you have incurred as a result of the injury sustained in this accident both solicitors reached conclusion that the figure comprising past and future lost would be dropped down to 12.5%. Quantum is agreed (subject to liability) at £9,598.82 (comprising general damages of £5,350 plus special damages of £4,248.82 being past loss of £4,759.80 + future loss of £96.00 = £4855.80. Less 12.5% = £4,248.82). -why is better to avoid the risk of trial

Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Alice H replied 3 years ago.
My name isXXXXX and I will try and assist you.

Please clarify: what exactly do you wish to know about this? And why isn't the solicitor writing the letter?
Customer: replied 3 years ago.



its the case scenario

so it has to be written by me as i am trainee legal executive

Expert:  Alice H replied 3 years ago.
Sorry I don't do homework.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

ok thank you

Expert:  Nicola-mod replied 3 years ago.

It seems the professional has left this conversation. This happens occasionally, and it's usually because the professional thinks that someone else might be a better match for your question. I've been working hard to find a new professional to assist you with your question, but sometimes finding the right professional can take a little longer than expected.

I wonder whether you're OK with continuing to wait for an answer. If you are, please let me know and I will continue my search. If not, feel free to let me know and I will cancel this question for you.

Thank you!
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

cancel please

do i still have to pay?

What Customers are Saying:

  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther

Meet The Experts:

  • Jo C.

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
< Previous | Next >
  • Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
  • Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • Buachaill's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Barrister 17 years experience
  • Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry


    Satisfied Customers:

    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • UK_Lawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • Kasare's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • Joshua's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice