How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jo C. Your Own Question

Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 70105
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

I want to bring a charge of misconduct in public office against

Customer Question

I want to bring a charge of misconduct in public office against a public officer. I don't know how to start or who I have to contact? The Officer concerned has used unlawful information in an Appeal case, as the primary evidence that the Judge relied on to dismiss the appeal. I did not know at the time of the appeal that the information wasn't lawful. The case is now waiting on Judicial Review.
Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Jo C. replied 3 years ago.

Jo C. :

Hi. Thank you for your question. My name is Jo and I will try to help with this. What is the case for, what organisation is involved and what unlawful information was used?

JACUSTOMER-fictfyrv- :

Hi Jo, The case is Cornwall Recruitment Limited and Adam Young versus the Gangmasters Licensing Appeals and Gangmasters Licensing Authority (GLA). The unlawful information came from HMRC's Enforcement & Insolvency department via the secure gateway and was used by the GLA as the primary evidence that HMRC was against our companies proposed pre-pack administration. I had argued in the Appeal that I had done everything correctly and had had a meeting with HMRC's Labour Provider Unit (LPU) on May 08 2012 at which time I was told they were fine with the pre-pack and that on commencement of trading we would have to provide a security bond. At our GLA licence inspection a member of the LPU was there and all this was discussed again. In the appeal however, the GLA inspector said he couldn't remember if the agreement was discussed or not. The GLA also argued in the appeal that I had made the meeting up and that they were not required to contact the Labour Provider Unit. HMRC document IDG51800 has the relevant information on lawful disclosure with the GLA. I have assumed that the GLA should know this. The Judge in the appeal was nice but said she had to make the decision based on the evidence from HMRC's Enforcement and Insolvency, as this was the GLA's case that the pre-pack did not have favour with HMRC. I had originally received the GLA's document bundle on 24 June 2013, the information above was sent to me on 1 August 2013, 28 days before the appeal. I did not know that they would use this as their primary evidence and as it was an appeal I couldn't call witnesses.

Expert:  Jo C. replied 3 years ago.

I have converted this to Q and A as I couldn't see your response.

What is the misconduct?

What Customers are Saying:

  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther

Meet The Experts:

  • Jo C.

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
< Previous | Next >
  • Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
  • Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • Buachaill's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Barrister 17 years experience
  • Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry


    Satisfied Customers:

    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • UK_Lawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • Kasare's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • Joshua's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice