Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
Hello, my name is XXXXX XXXXX it is my pleasure to assist you with your question today.
What do you hope to achieve please?
I want to know if I have a case against my employers
How long did you work there for?
That's in my initial message, 8 years
Apologies, my error, I see it now. So you actually took the alternative role they offered you, yet are doing your old duties, is that right?
Yes just the same as before
so you did not receive any redundancy, but your pay has been reduced as a result?
I did receive redundancy pay but am only supposed to be doing an admin role now. I am doing the job I was made redundant from
ok let me get my response ready please
The term 'redundancy' is used to describe a situation in which an employer decides to reduce the number of its employees. There are various reasons as to why redundancies may be required, such as economic pressure, changes in the nature of products/services offered, internal reorganisation, workplace relocation, etc. The reason for the proposed redundancies will rarely be challenged and the employer will simply have to justify that the actual reason satisfied the statutory definition of a redundancy, which can be found in The Employment Rights Act 1996:
1. Business closure – where the whole of the employer’s business is closed
2. Workplace closure – closure or relocation of one or more sites
3. Reduced requirement for employees to carry out work of a particular kind (this is where many employees get confused as they believe a job has to actually disappear for them to be made redundant).
The third reason above creates the most challenges and is most likely to be the reason they used in this case. Examples of when there is a reduced requirement to do work of a particular kind are:
So as long as the employer can show that their situation fell within one of the accepted reasons for declaring a redundancy, the test will be satisfied and the focus then shifts on the remainder of the redundancy procedure. This would include what consultation took place, whether any suitable alternative employment was offered to those at risk and the general fairness of the redundancy procedure applied by the employer.
If you doing your old job is just a temporary thing, for example whilst any reorganisation is complete, then it could still make the original dismissal fair. However, if it appears that this is not something that will change any time soon and that the reasons for your original redundancy no longer apply, you certainly have the right to ask for your old job back, or threaten to take the matter to an employment tribunal and claim for unfair dismissal.
Ok thanks, XXXXX XXXXX I will see if anything changes, which I'm sure it won't, then a tribunal seems the best way.
yes, correct - if you have not yet appealed the redundancy you may do so, otherwise it is the tribunal after that as your only option