How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Ash Your Own Question
Ash
Ash, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 10916
Experience:  Solicitor with 5+ years experience
75100385
Type Your Law Question Here...
Ash is online now

I was on the DWP Work Programme ,I had evidence that

Resolved Question:

I was on the DWP Work Programme ,I had evidence that Ingeus was railroading me to work with an illegal employer . I began the complaints procedure on one of the Ingeus computers - they discovered this easily , since all their computers are BUGGED . ( I believe this is also illegal )
They asked me to leave their office citing me as a " trouble maker " . I immediately asked for the cctv coverage , (proving I had applied for 20 jobs during the visit to the Ingeus office ) , when reporting the matter to the police, local DWP office , and M.P.
The complaints procedure lasted 6 months, each level rubberstamping the one below
Then passed on .... to the DWP Independant Case Examiner (I.C.E. ) , they spent
over a year in denial of my evidence e.g. That Ingeus lied to the Information
Commissioners Office (I.C.O.)"stating that ICO supported the Ingeus legal claim to hold (not release ) the cctv evidence ".When ICO wrote to me, they said they have
no records , of contact with Ingeus .......moreover ICE they have ignored FOUR letters
from the M.P. asking the cctv evidence be available to both Ingeus staff AND their clients , and the ICO exposure of Ingeus be treated seriously .
Furthermore , they have not investigated the spurious claims of Ingeus about me
but amazingly .... added more spurious claims citing various written statements
( In court - this would be perjury , they would get custodial sentences .)
THE POLICE ADVISED ME TO TAKE THEM ALL TO COURT , DWP AND
INGEUS , FOR DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER .
However , without the cctv evidence - I have no case !!

THESE COVER - UP JOBS HAVE COST ABOUT £ 50 ,OOO AND HAVE
INVOLVED ABOUT 40 - 60 DIFFERENT NAMES , INFERRING THAT
INGEUS AND THE DWP ARE " RUNNING SCARED "

ASK A QUESTION : HOW SHOULD I PROCEED ?

I AM STILL LONG - TERM UNEMPLOYED , ONE OF THOSE WHO WAS NOT
CHERRY PICKED , AS EXPOSED ON BBC PANORAMA ( c.f. Sam Pollard )
No hurry for a reply , when you are ready : [email protected]
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ADVICE - IN ADVANCE !!
P.S. Further information is available , if you need it .
Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Jo C. replied 3 years ago.
Hi.

Thank you for your question. My name is XXXXX XXXXX I will try to help with this.

What would you like to know about this please?
Customer: replied 3 years ago.


Hello XXXXX


 


Firstly, I want to subscribe to "Just Answer " I have a plethora of


questons on NHS , Gagging order etc. but one step at a time,


with yourself ........ and the DWP . ................................................


 


I asked " How should I proceed " ie . put yourself in my shoes , I want to expose them all !! I am livid !!


I need an Abby Martin " Breaking the Set " on RT TV


( c.f. www.youtube.com / breakingtheset ) or a Michael Mansfield Q.C . who has exposed the South Yorkshire Police


over the Hillsborough Disaster .......................................................


 


The police are aware and advised me to represent myself in court , and expose them for defamation of character .


 


There are 4 criteria to be satisfied :


 


1 Proof of false statement - I NEED THE CCTV COVERAGE !!


2 Statement be public - I have written evidence


3 Negligence - they would not listen to ICO or my M.P.


4 Proof I have sustained damage - Very difficult !! ???????


 


Ingeus have false records that I am a trouble maker ..........


The police have advised , that I never return , lest Ingeus


conjure up more false records , on the previous false records .


 


Moreover , I am being thwarted from exposing these pernicious


and useless bureaucrats as parasites on the taxpayer ..........!!


I am aware morality and the law are not in unison , but for


myself , £120 Billion /annum wasted on useless bureaucrats in


the Civil Service and NHS evokes a righteous anger .................


John the baptist and Jesus would describe them as " Broods of Vipers " .


 


I am off the " Work Programme " , Ingeus did nothing for me.....


but I may be required " by law " , to return to their office .....


 


My present circumstances include being long - term unemployed ,


I cannot get a bank loan to inaugurate a business and am


approaching 60 . I am on Carers Allowance / Income Support


I take care of my 86 year old mother . However the DWP


are capable of terminating my benefits without notice , for an


indefinate period of time . The knock - on effect on my mother ,


would be devastating !!


 


I have been here before ...............................................................!!


I wrote to the Prime Minister Gordon Brown regarding


"Crosby Training" a precursor of Ingeus but equally useless


with the " New Deal " , under the previous Labour Government .


It was arranged that I meet a Colin Billingsley , at the DWP


office of Eastbank House ......... when I devoted two hours


exposing "Crosby Training ", for NOT assisting the unemployed back to work , even though they were paid under contract .


Colin Billingsley received a mountain of evidence and assured


me he would conduct a thorough investifgation - he was


an outrageous liar , and cover - up artist .


He never wrote back .............. and gave intimidating replies to subsequent follow - up emails .


 


Consequently, when I first wrote to ICE in January of 2013


I asked them to investigate (a) Crosby Training and (b) Ingeus .


They refused , only pretending to investigate Ingeus .


More cover - up work , and also protecting Colin Billingsley .


 


Crosby Training and Ingeus are scurrilous organisations with


over - paid yobbo personnel , that are tools of the DWP.


All mainstream political parties use these tools to bully the


unemployed , and grovel to the big business corporations .....


thus keeping the working plebians , on low salaries .


 


This costs the taxpayer about £10 Billion /annum enough


to buld 4 hospitals ....................a small part of the £120 Billion


of taxpayers money wasted every year by impotent politicians ,


turning Britain from a Democracy , into a Corpotocracy .


 


IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ANYTHING I WROTE , PLEASE
PASS ME ON , TO ONE OF YOUR COLLEAGUES , IF YOU


AGREE , PLEASE PUT YOURSELF IN MY SHOES ...................


HOW SHOULD I PROCEED ? ( No one - liners again !! )


 


Stephen Kirkland .


 


P.S . TAKE YOUR TIME REPLYING , YOU MAY NEED TO CONSULT WITH OTHERS ..... BUT PLEASE REPLY BEFORE


WEDNESDAY .


 

Expert:  Jo C. replied 3 years ago.
Thanks

What is the defamation of character ? What exactly is the statement that damaged your reputation?
Customer: replied 3 years ago.


I am back again ......


 


Your questions are specific .... designed to establish the details


and based on logical thought .............!!


Crosby Training , Ingeus and the DWP are a hegemony


of unaccountable cowards , who are purveyors of vagueism .


These job providers or as Afshin Rattansi ("Going Underground "


on RT TV ) ....... WOULD DESCRIBE AS SLAVE TRADERS ........


are given a mandate by the DWP to order ........................ the


unemployed , as they feel ,................... with total impunity .


Should the unemployed persons ( that is correct Jo , we are dealing with people , not livestock ) fail to be obsequious


their benefits are terminated for a minimum of 12 weeks


and as you are aware the Independent Case Examiner (I.C.E. )


sends you through the Ingeus Complaint Procedure ( 6 mths. )


and their own (13 mths ) - so people become dependent on


foodbanks and in some cases homeless , costing social services etc. £millions - absolute lunacy !! (After 19 mths. )


This aforementioned mandate was introduced after my


incident , when I was expelled . There are some who argue


that my defiant stand , and whistleblowing , resulted in such


legislation being passed ............................................................!!


So far I have not had benefits cut - but if I persue further


whisleblowing , that could change . As the Ancient Greek s


would say ............................... " Everything flows " .


ARE YOU AWARE OF ALL THIS JO ? THAT IS WHY I AM
HERE WRITING TO YOU !!


 


Right then , it would be helpful if I described the circumstances


on the day I was expelled from the Ingeus office and as recorded on the cctv ( which I need )...... then deal with the


vagueism of the incorrigible profligate miscreants - how they are playing " mind games " .


 


I arrived expecting trouble because I had sent a letter of complaint the day before , so obviously , they would be ready to ambush me . ( The complaint letter involved the illegal employers to whom a Yvonne Pritchard , wanted to introduce . )


I played to the cameras , arriving early , I chose a computer in which I could be monitored by a camera as applying for 10 - 20


jobs and after each application , getting a photocopy from


copier . After one hour I deliberately walked in to the car park


outside the office to rest my eyes ( from staring at a computer screen ) I left the office with one of their clients , who I had met briefly and we talked about football for two minutes .


During this short conversation , Yvonne Pritchard ( who was railroading me to an illegal employer and the subject of my complaint letter ) comes out screaming .........................


and accuses me of bullying this other unemployed man


(Absolute lunacy !! ) then she returns to the office .


The other unemployed man , continues on his way and I then return to complete more job applications , and photocopies .


However , before sitting down , I approached Yvonne Pritchard


( under the cameras ) rebuking her for interferring with my private conversations , off the premises .


(If I had not rebuked her , it would prove I was a eunoch ,


and affraid of her .)


I continued to collect photocopies of all my job applications


and still possess them ( ICE deny they exist - all mind games)


A young lady ( an unemployed client ) chose to sit beside me and use an adjacent computer . I had left some paper work in her space and apologised . She smiled ( again all on camera ).


After approximately two hours I went to the gents toilet for


2 minutes , I had not drank anything on the Ingeus premises .


Then when the office was empty except for Ingeus personnel


and myself , Yvonne Pritchard approached me and alleged


I had been creating trouble and asked me to leave the office and not return . I ignored her , and worked upon more business


on the computer .


Yvonne Pritchard then returned with a male colleague (name unknown ) again citing me as a troublemaker ..................


I ignored her again ( and continued to play to the cameras )


The third time she asked me , I tidied my desk , deliberately


slowly , and took my time returning paper clips to


to a special tray by the reception desk , ( whilst Yvonne Pritchard and her male colleague are standing on either side


tempting me to " bang their heads together " .......................... )


However , I walk out slowly and took all my job applications


to the DWP office to show Leanda Taylor (DWP Southport


Office Management ) ...... ten minutes later . I said to her


quite flippantly ( because she knows me well , after exposing "Crosby Training " ) You had better believe in horror stories ....


because you are in one " .


I let her know " From your records I sent the complaint email to YOU yesterday , and now I have evidence the Ingeus


computers are bugged , that is how they knew , and why


they ambushed me "


Then I went down to the M.P.s office .



After all the Ingeus cover - up jobs , a Joanna Wallace


of ICE has written 6-7 page report which is complete defam,ation of character but not specific to individuals


and their statements . She alleges the following :


 


(1) I went to the office and did nothing except write a


complaint letter . In total denial I have the photocopies of


the job applications (as recorded on camera )


( I was sending copies of the complaint letter to Ingeus


personnel when I was "asked to leave " . the original


complaint letter (all on record in my yahoo account )


went to Susan Clamp and Leanda Taylor of the local DWP


Southport Office , as mentioned above , so I could prove the


Ingeus computers were bugged . ( That is how they knew . )


(2) That the man in the car park returned to write a complaint


letter about me (Absolute Lunacy ) ,and gesticulated at me .


(3) That Ingeus personnel have written reports about me


again no names or statements - but remenber Jo ,


they all big proponents of vagueism ..................................


Moreover , a report .... is a report .. in the sight of somebody


assesing my benefts money ( not usually a positive person ) .


(4) That I went missing for 15 minutes at the back of the


office (More Lunacy !! ) ( This exageration about a trip to


the toilet ( 2 mins ) )


(5) In denial of receiving specific complaints from the M.P.


e.g missing the " elephant in the room " . That Ingeus


North West Director Barry Fletcher claimed he had the


blessing of The Information Commissioners Office( I.C.O.) to


withold the cctv evidence - but I.C.O. deny all knowledge


of Ingeus . Here ,Joanna Wallace is doing a cover - up


job for a top boss ,on a big salary , who is a common liar !!


e.g the cover - up job over Colin Billingsey , who did the


cover - up job over Crosby Training


 


Over the last two weeks since receiving the Joanna Wallace


cover - up , I asked for the complaints resolution people at


the DWP . They gave me an incorrect address , acted as buffoons over one lettter (Leanda Taylor rebuked them ) ,


and two letters to their boss asking him to investigate the total incompetence of ICE and represent me to the DWP North West Director, David Simms , have been ignored !!


 


WHEN YOU EXPOSE THE DWP FOR INCOMPETENCE AND CORRUPTION , THEY FALL SILENT !!


 


HOWEVER , AT RANDOM AND FOR NO REASON THEY
SWITCH OFF PEOPLES BENEFITS , AND WITHOUT ANY
EXPLANATION ............SWICH THEM BACK ON .


SO I AM IN A HIGH RISK STRATEGY !!


 


HOW DO I GET THEM ALL FOR DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER


UNDER LIBEL LAWS ?


MOREOVER , BREAKING THE DATA PROTECTION ACT ?


SINCE THEY WILL NOT RELEASE THE CCTV COVERAGE
SO , I CAN CLEAR MY NAME !!


ALSO , ALL THESE COVER - UP JOBS ARE COSTING


THE TAXPAYER A FORTUNE ..... HOW DO I EXPOSE THEM ?


 


NOW YOU HAVE BEEN EDUCATED ON THE SLEEZBAGS


OF THE DWP AND THEIR ACCOMPLACES , WHAT


WOULD YOU DO , JO , IF YOU WERE ME ?


THIS DEBACLE HAS CONTINUED FOR NEARLY THREE


YEARS , IT KEEPS THE SLEEZBAGS IN A JOB , AND THEY


PRESENT ONE SMOKESCREEN AFTER ANOTHER


ONE COVER - UP AFTER ANOTHER , ALL DESIGNED


TO STOP ME EXPOSING THE TRUTH ..... THAT WORK PROVIDERS ARE OPERATING IN CONTRAVENTION WITH


EMPLOYMENT LAWS , AND HEALTH AND SAFETY .


 


HOW SHOULD I PROCEED ?


 


 


Stephen Kirkland .

Expert:  Jo C. replied 3 years ago.
Hi

Thanks for the detail. I'm afraid that your post I think exceeds the word length and I can't see it all on my ipad. Is it possible to summarise it?
Customer: replied 3 years ago.


I AM TOTALLY CONFUSED ...........................................!!


 


Everything is all in excellant presentable order on my computer


 


and at the end there is your third message ..............


 


So your ipad has problems with 3 long messages and your two short messages .........................................................................


and my prehistoric Packard Bell desk top , with windows XP


presents three long messages and not just 2 .............. but 3


small messages from you , really well .


I have been using the ancient Sony lab top with windows 7


for two hours , I just wanted to rest it , and have a practice with the lab top ......................................................................


I do not know what to say ........ I spend about 4 hours


sending three long messages , and you inform me that your


ipad cannot handle them.....................................


That is a perfect advertisement ......... not to buy an ipad !!


 


Moreover , who was the monkey who designed the Just Answer website , without warning the customers that they


should be restricted to a specific number of words ?


 


It is a little like asking God to dilute the bible ....................


" Throw out those stories about your son raising people from the dead , and throw out David and Goliath "


 


I shall wait a couple of days for you all , to get your act together ............................................................................................!!


 


Writing again on Thursday , but I have misgivings you


are another bunch of con - merchants masquarading as


Legal Advisors ..................................!!


 


I spend £33 , invest four hours of my time .................


and no result .


 


Stephen Kirkland .

Expert:  Jo C. replied 3 years ago.
Sorry, can't help.

Opting out.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.
Relist: Other.
You assigned Joe C to my case .
She does not have the technology to read the information she requested . She wrote back " I am opting out "
Please provide me with an expert who is in possession of appropriate technology .

Moreover,someone who will refer me to another expert (if required ) and not leave me in the cold saying "I am opting out . The other alternative - return my £33 . You will lose a good customer who wanted to subscribe and I lose 4 hours of my time ...........!!
Expert:  Ash replied 3 years ago.
Hello my name is XXXXX XXXXX I will help you with this. Please note that I am a working Solicitor and may be on and offline as I have to attend Court and meet with clients, even at weekends. As such you may not get an instant response when you reply as this is not an ‘on demand’ live service, but rest assured I will be giving your question my immediate attention upon return. There is no need to wait here, you will get an email when I reply.

I see the expert has opted out.

In short there has been defamation is that right? I just need a yes or no from you at this stage.

Alex



Customer: replied 3 years ago.


Hello Alex


 


Thank you for your nice letter . Your predecessor never wrote


like that ...................... I think she has lost interest in the job .......


and sits around with her ipad on the sofa each night ,


expecting people who are suffering , to entertain her ...............


Anyway , I have had my two day recovery from her , and established contact with a solicitor with a human face ........!!


Let us proceed there is no hurry - please reply when you can


but atleast once every five days .........................................


 


YOUR QUESTION ETC.


 


DO YOU HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY TO HAVE READ EVERYTHING THAT I SUPPLIED TO YOUR PREDECESSOR


INCLUDING WHAT I WROTE ON 23 FEB 2014 14.07 est ?


SHE DID NOT ? WHICH WAS RATHER AUSPICIOUS ?


 


DEFAMATION IS DIFFICULT TO PROVE :


 


I HAVE NOTHING TANGIBLE , NO STATEMENTS JUST A


SERIES OF BIZARRE REPORTS CITING I HAVE CREATED


TROUBLE AND ACTED STRANGELY .


 


DWP WILL NOT SUPPLY THE CCTV OR ATTEMPT TO GET


ACCESS TO IT , OR RELEASE IT TO THE POLICE FOR


INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS , WHICH WOULD EXONERATE ME . ALL SUGGESTED BY MY M.P. WHO THEY APPEAR TO REGARD AS A COURT JESTER , THEY HAVE IGNORED ALL


FOUR OF HIS LETTERS , OR PROVIDED VAGUE ANSWERS


TO HIM .


MOREOVER , I HAVE A LETTER FROM THE INFORMATION


COMMISSIONERS OFFICE WHO HAVE CONFIRMED THAT


THEY HAVE HAD NO CONTACT WITH INGEUS OR THE DWP


AND ARE NOT SUPPORTIVE IN THEIR CLAIM , NOT TO RELEASE THE CCTV .


 


WHAT IS ON THE TABLE ;


 


I CAN EXPOSE INGEUS / DWP AS A SLAVE TRADER


AND CONDUCTING ILLIGITIMATE BUSINESS .


THEY KNOW THAT , HOWEVER BY KEEPING A COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE ALIVE FOR YEARS , AND DEFAMING MY CHARACTER - EVERYTHING IS ON HOLD !!


 


COSTING THE TAXPAYER A FORTUNE !!


 


I AM STILL LONG - TERM UNEMPLOYED , NO ASSISTANCE


OR SUBSIDIES FROM THE GOVERNMENT LIKE THOSE RECEIVED BY BIG BUSINESS CORPORATIONS .................


AND THE DWP COULD CUT OR SUSPEND MY BENEFITS


WITHOUT REASON ( I CHECKED ON MONDAY - THEY HAVE


NOT TAKEN ACTION YET ........... BUT ALWAYS A TENTATIVE MOMENT.................CHECKING THE BENEFITS ARE PAID )


 


IT IS NOT AN OPEN OR CLOSED CASE , I AM CONVINCED


YOU NEED TO CONSULT WITH COLLEAGUES !!


 


BEST WISHES , IF YOU DO NOT HAVE TIME TO REPLY


OVER THE NEXT 24 HOURS - NO PROBLEM !!


 


 


 


 


STEPHEN KIRKLAND .


 

Expert:  Ash replied 3 years ago.
Stephen

If I am being totally honest you may have a claim but it is very difficult process to follow and very expensive.

You are looking at having to pay specialist (not High Street) Solicitors and Barristers around £15,000 to get it to Court. You will NOT get legal aid.

This is because these proceedings are very specialised and need to be dealt with in the High Court in front of a jury.

If for whatever reason you lose then you would be liable for the costs of the other side. That is another £15,000.

So your total expose is £30,000 overall for which you can NOT get legal aid.

So you can pursue a claim but it is very expensive.

I am sorry if this ism not the answer you want and certainly not the one I want to give you, but I have a duty to be honest.

Can I clarify anything for you about this today please?

Alex

Customer: replied 3 years ago.

HI THERE ALEX - THANKYOU FOR THE REPLY ...........I DID NOT EXPECT YOU TO BE ONLINE . I AM GETTING OFF IN 10 MINUTES .


 


EXCELLANT ANSWER : THE POLICE ADVISE ME TO REPRESENT MYSELF , MOREOVER I AM HOPING TO GET A TV COMPANY TO PAY FOR EVERYTHING ......... IF I SHOULD LOSE ................!!


HOW DO I CIRCUMVENT DWP DIRTY TACTICS :


(A) PLEAD THEY ARE "PRIVALEGED" - NOT REQUIRED TO


ANSWER CERTAIN QUESTIONS .


(B) THEY WOULD HAVE TO BRIBE THE JUDGE :


IF I SHOULD WIN ....... IT WOULD BE HEADLINE NEWS ........


THE DWP WORK PROGRAMME WOULD BE EXPOSED ........


AND I WOULD SEVERLEY DAMAGE ITS SUPPORTERS ............


IT IS OBVIOUS ...................... I CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO WIN .


ESPECIALLY SO CLOSE TO A GENERAL ELECTION .


 


 


BUT BY TAKING THEM ON - I WOULD MAKE FRIENDS AND ENEMIES - IT IS ALL VERY IMPONDERABLE !!


.................... AND FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE !!


 


NO HURRY FOR A REPLY - JUST CONSIDER SOME OLD


FILM HEROES ;


* KIRK DOUGLAS - SPARTICUS ( " SPARTICUS" )


* MEL GIBSON - WILLIAM WALLACE (" BRAVEHEART " )


* RUSSEL CROWE - MAXIMUS DECIMUS MERIDIUS


("GLADIATOR ")


 


ALEX , IT IS BETTER TO DIE ON MY FEET THAN DIE ON MY KNEES - I AM APPROACHING 60 ....... THE NHS WRECKED MY LEGS ............. THE DWP HAVE NOW RUINED MY LIFE.......


I SHALL TAKE THEM ALL ....... WITH ME ..................................!!


HOW DO I PROCEED ? PRESUME WHAT YOU WRITE NEXT , WILL TRAVEL FAR AND WIDE .


 


OH YES !! CAN I STILL RECEIVE BENEFITS IF I TAKE THE DWP TO THE HIGH COURT . COULD THEY CREATE A NEW LAW SAYING " ANYONE TAKING LEGAL ACTION AGAINST US,


IS NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS "?


 


 


STEPHEN KIRKLAND .


 


 


 

Expert:  Ash replied 3 years ago.
They wont bribe the Judge. This may happen on TV but not in real life, it just does not happen.

As for privilege that only applies for correspondence between the Solicitor and the client regarding proceedings - NOTHING else.

Does this help?

Alex

Ash, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 10916
Experience: Solicitor with 5+ years experience
Ash and other Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 3 years ago.


HELLO AGAIN ALEX ,


 


1 . HOW MANY QUESTIONS CAN I ASK FOR MY £33


BEFORE I HAVE TO TAKE OUT A SUBSCRIPTION ?


 


2 . I AM GETTING BACK TO THE TELEVISION PEOPLE


AND I COULD SAY " I HAVE ESTABLISHED CONTACT


WITH SOME SOLICITOR WITH A HUMAN FACE , ON


THE INTERNET , I HAVE NOT ASKED THE


SOLICITORS PERMISSION TO RELEASE THEIR NAME ...


THEN MENTION , I WOULD NEED SPECIALIST ADVICE


(AS YOU SAID , ALEX ) IF REPRESENTING MYSELF


TO GET IT TO COURT , AND SEE WHAT THEY SAY ......


 


THEN GET IN TOUCH WITH MY POLITICAL CONTACTS....


 


ALEX ARE YOU DEFINATELY GOING TO BE AROUND,


AND AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS OVER THE NEXT


4 WEEKS ?


 


3 I SHALL TELEPHONE THE LOCAL SOUTHPORT


MAGISTRATES COURT , AND SEE WHAT INFO. I CAN GET


OUT OF THEM ON MONDAY .


IF I GO TO THE HIGH COURT , WOULD IT BE HERE IN


LANCASHIRE ?


4 YOU FORGOT TO ANSWER THE QUESTION " CAN THE


DWP CUT OFF MY BENEFITS , IF I TAKE LEGAL ACTION


AGAINST THEM " ?


 


STEPHEN KIRKLAND .



 

Expert:  Ash replied 3 years ago.
You can ask as many questions as you want on the same subject. If it is a different subject you have to ask a new question.

I will be around in 4 weeks, all things being equal yes.

Alex

Customer: replied 3 years ago.

Hello Alex - sorry about the delay ... not my fault ....................!!


 


The M.P. suggested I write back to the Information Commissioners Office (I.C.O.) asking them them to justify their existence - I did !!


( Remember , they said they had no formal contact with Ingeus


but Ingeus had trumpeted , that they had their unequivocal support . )



ICO took over 3 - 4 weeks to reply :


(1) they confirm - no contact with Ingeus


(2) suggest I ask once more for the cctv disc ...since it is some time since I first applied .


I shall follow their advice , however, (I.C.O. ) do not realise that


I am dealing with absolute psychopaths ........................!!


DWP Independent Case Examiner refuse to acknowledge the


receipt of TANGIBLE EVIDENCE ( letters from the M.P. from


ICO and the job applications proving I was busy , all morning )


so why should they acknowledge receipt of another ICO letter ?



Moreover , you wrote Alex about privalege being attorny / client


privalege - you did not explain about Govenment officials


claiming privalege status - so that they do not have to appear in


court hearings ......can the DWP declare privalege status ?


How do I prove I have been damaged through defamation of character - since nobody holds the opinion of the DWP in high regard ?


You initially warned me it would take £15,000 to get the case to court and infer I could lose this , and have to pay the other side


their £15 ,000 ...............the DWP have no tangible evidence ,


whereas I have plenty - so how on earth could I lose ?


Finally Alex , you said judges only get bribed in films ..................


since judges are perceived as scurrilous rats , and I could


expose the DWP ........ the Government Coalition Flagship ................


for what it is ............surely a £10 million bribe would pay him off


before a general election ? What do you think now ?



Please reply soon - before Wednesday !!



Have a nice week - end !!





 

Related Law Questions