Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
Adherence to the planning regulations and those responsible for the maladministration held to account, otherwise what is the point of having regulations if they can be so easily broken by vested interests .
The original wall planning colours and roofing were changed. The roof we feel to facilitate the Vodafone/O2 relay. Coincidentally the head of that organisation in Scotland was a Governor of the Academy who when all the questions started to be raised, resigned the Governorship. It was seemingly standard practice in England for such entities to finance new school buildings to allow the installation of their equipment. This was discontinued a few years ago in England because of fears for the health of young children. We are a few years behind the curve in Scotland! If as seems to be the case, then why should these children be exposed to harmful wireless waves? I have tried OFCOM to establish the situation, but by law the suppliers only have to register Main Masts and not the sub stations. No one seems to be bothered, but of course they are not their children.
Realise difficult to change "fait accompli" and as a last resort the academy could ask for planning changes in retrospect. Repeat those responsible should be held to account and the health risk to the vulnerable children should be exposed. Have I talked myself in releasing to the Media?
There is a correction for the above.
The roof was downgraded to cheap Aluminium instead of the specified Zinc. which then basically facilitates wireless transmission/receive. whilst Zinc blocks it