How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jo C. Your Own Question

Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 69268
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

Is it likely that the CPS in England would prosecute a "Theft

Customer Question

Is it likely that the CPS in England would prosecute a "Theft Breach of Trust" committed in 1994 if compelling evidence existed such as the accused admitting it while being digitally recorded. Other important documentary evidence from the public record and victims statement also exist.

Barrister opinion preferred
Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Jo C. replied 2 years ago.

Thank you for your question. My name is Jo and I will try to help with this.

-Could you explain your situation a little more?

Customer: replied 2 years ago.

I have discovered that a male relative has defrauded three people (two from outside the family) during the time when he was an executor. One example is when he should have paid the residual beneficiary over £130,000.00 but he only paid out about £30,000.00. The probate statement and the will are not ambiguous - the will provides fixed amount gifts to a few charities, with the residue to the testator's relative. The amount due to that residual beneficiary is over £131,000.00. The person only received just over £30,000.00 in transferred savings certificates and shares (no money). The person had no idea how much their relative had left until recently when I discovered the fraud. I have always got on well with my relative, the executor, but my greatest duty is to the beneficiary who has been denied any statement of estate accounts and who was defrauded of over £100,000.00. I asked my relative how much did he pay out to the residual beneficiary (I digitally recorded him). He said that he gave the person £30,000.00. After a lot of investigation, the paperwork shows that this figure was the amount paid out. A similar fraud was also discovered with another will where my relative was executor. A third case was found where a similar, but not identical, fraud is evident. The evidence for all cases is compelling. My relative seems quite contemptuous and clearly he feels that he is beyond the law. I am horrified. I have heard that "Theft Breach of Trust" is not time barred but I wanted a legal opinion. The facts will be reported anyhow.

Expert:  Jo C. replied 2 years ago.
You want to report this I presume?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

Of course. I have completed a detailed report and I have reached the stage when I can report it together with handing over a detailed report with associated documentation etc. From a family point of view this is horrendous, but I have a greater duty to the truth, the law and those who have been defrauded, than to my relative (with whom I have always got on well with)

Expert:  Jo C. replied 2 years ago.

There is no reason they could not prosecute this. This is either a theft or a fraud neither of which are summary only offences so they have no time deadlines.

However, it is fair to say that there are some offences that they are more reluctant to prosecute stale than others. Conventionally they do not prosecute old thefts.

That said, there is no really justification for it. Of they can prosecute all and sundry for making passes at people in 1962 then there is no reason that they should not prosecute this.

You may have to complain to be given the same priority as a stale sexual offence with no chance of success but overall if you did I think you would probably win

Can I clarify anything for you?


What Customers are Saying:

  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther

Meet The Experts:

  • Jo C.

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
< Last | Next >
  • Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
  • Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • Buachaill's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Barrister 17 years experience
  • Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry


    Satisfied Customers:

    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • UK_Lawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • Kasare's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • Joshua's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice