Hello my name is XXXXX XXXXX I will help you with this. Please note that I am a working Solicitor and may be on and offline as I have to attend Court and meet with clients, even at weekends. As such you may not get an instant response when you reply, but rest assured I will be giving your question my immediate attention upon return You do not need to wait here as you will get an email when I reply.
So the Receiver has not yet been officially appointed?
It was on 7/12/13 that I found out that my property was being sold when I read the local Newspaper and saw my property being advertised by a local Agent. When I visited this Agent and asked him who Authorised him to sell the Property he showed me the Appointment form which was signed and dated 11/12/13 . I then told him that this was part of an ongoing Fraud by a Lender which was Highlited in Radio 4 on Face the Facts last week he said that he had been instructed by this Receiver and he was carrying on. When I challenged about the Date on the Appointment he said that the fact that he had not been officially Appointed when they arranged the sale did not matter. I then asked him when had the Receiver met on site to arrange the sale and he said that the Receiver had never visited the site.
The Receiver shouldn't take any steps until actually appointed.
But does this invalidate any steps taken - probably not
It just means that you do not need to co-operate with the Receiver until they are actually appointed
But if the lender appointed a Receiver, but you did not know actually makes no diference
So generally there should be a formal appointment, then they can take steps
Can I clarify anything for you about this today please?
Does this mean that he should not have taken any steps to arrange the sale before he was formally appointed . Is he within his Rights to refuse to discuss the matter with me . When I spoke to his Solicitor they said that he had been trying to contact . As he obviously had not tried to contact me because they had my email address my phone no which has an answering machine My mobile no which has message recording. It seems to me that they were trying to cover him up.
Yes he should not take taken any steps, after all he was not instructed until appointed so how could he?
He can refuse to discuss with you as he is not appointed by you but the lender. But he should take all steps that are reasonable.
Can I clarify anything else?
Thank you for confirming that he should not have taken any steps until he was formally appointed. It might be of interest to you to have a look at The Farming Forum on the internet click Agricultural Matters. It will show you some of the Background to this Fraud. Together with the programme on Radio 4 last week it will give you a rough idea of how this Fraud is being committed. Thanks again
No problem - glad I could help
If this answers your question could I invite you leave feedback on my service which I hope has been excellent today, if you need more information or help then please click reply.
Please remember that I am always happy to help if you have future questions, even if I am in Court I can normally respond within a few hours. For future information, please start them with ‘For Alex W’.
Please bookmark my profile if you wish for future help: http://www.justanswer.co.uk/law/expert-alexwatts/