How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jo C. Your Own Question

Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 69368
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

I have received an NIP ( speeding), the NIP states the location

Customer Question

I have received an NIP ( speeding), the NIP states the location as Warwick Bridge, there is no Speed camera in Warwick Bridge, there is one in the village before Warwick Bridge, and the associated roadmarkings for the camera are also in the village before Warwick Bridge. There is a road sign some 40 mtrs after the Camera and Roadmarkings stating Warwick Bridge. The villages have totally different names so there cannot be any confusion there.

I have received 3 photos of the vehicle in question and these show it is not in Warwick Bridge, but in the village prior to it.
Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Jo C. replied 2 years ago.

Thank you for your question. My name is Jo and I will try to help with this.

What would you like to know about this please?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.


The NIP shows alleged speeding at Warwick Bridge, the camera and roadmarkings are east of Warwick Bridge in the next village named Corby Hill.

Each village is clearly marked with it's name by way of road signs.


So basically I have an NIP with a given location 'Warwick Bridge' where there is not speed camera.




Expert:  Jo C. replied 2 years ago.
Yes, so what is your question about this?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

Is the NIP invalid as it has the incorrect location ?



Expert:  Jo C. replied 2 years ago.
Were you speeding but at a different location?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.


Expert:  Jo C. replied 2 years ago.

The short answer is that it doesn't invalidate the NIP but you do have an argument. It depends whether you are willing to bear the risk of raising it.

The document you have received is confusing but it combines two separate legal entities.

The first is a NIP. That is perfectly valid whatever the location. That does no more than warn you of the risk that you will be prosecuted.

The second is a S172 request demanding the identity of the driver. You are free to send that back as indeed your vehicle was not at the alleged location. You do need to include a cover letter explaining. Obviously this is predicated on the basis that the location is entirely wrong rather than just a misspelling.

If they send out a further S172 citing the correct details then you would have to comply.

If they dig their heels in and maintain this location then you are free to maintain that your car was not at that place at that time.

Can I clarify anything for you?


What Customers are Saying:

  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther

Meet The Experts:

  • Jo C.

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
< Last | Next >
  • Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
  • Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • Buachaill's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Barrister 17 years experience
  • Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry


    Satisfied Customers:

    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • UK_Lawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • Kasare's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • Joshua's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice