Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
The accountant was negligent with Trust, did not include additions, and sued me (trustee) for the alleged loss when it was discovered by myself. They used their co. insur. to get indemnity, which I hope can get overturned following discovery of facts.
Yes - I had retired to N.Z. following the accountants refusal to complete accounts, inc. Trust accounts (which I discovered did not exist) which were 3 years late - considerable problems in accounts - new accountant has proof. Substantial evidence but needs viewing properly - had to leave country due to inl. rev. & co. house problems, now resolved. Assets at that time in excess of £4m. now lost. The case got to Court, but the solicitors acting for me "stuffed up" - I have proof of specifics.
Yes, I had retired to New Zealand following the accountants refusal to complete the accounts, including the Trust accounts, (which I later discovered did not exist) which were three years late. Considerable problems in the accounts, and new accountant has proof. There is substantial evidence, but needs viewing properly. I had to leave the Country due to Inland Revenue and Company House pressures, and problems, now resolved. Assets at that time in excess of £4million now lost. The case got to Court, but the solicitors acting for me "stuffed up", and I have proof of that, I have now forwarded eighteen pages to Fraud Office under the term Fraud Act 1968, and awaiting results.
Thanks Jo, I am awaiting results from Fraud Office, and then will instruct a lawyer of standing, I think the perjury angle may be difficult, in that they have devious ways (solicitors, that is - do you agree?) but the criminal angle is already under way - I presume that the CCJ would have to be applied for by solicitor. Obviously, you would need to see all he evidence to make a proper assessment so I consider that your office would not be able to advise me further, in an Unjust Enrichment case, so please cancel any further payments. Yours sincerely ***** *****