How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask LondonlawyerJ Your Own Question
LondonlawyerJ
LondonlawyerJ, Advocate
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 813
Experience:  Solicitor with over 15 years experience.
76316425
Type Your Law Question Here...
LondonlawyerJ is online now

One of my team of security officers, is responsible for the

Customer Question

One of my team of security officers, is responsible for the theft of some money from the site, but my company HR dept. will not sanction polygraph testing to identify the culprit, and wants to give the whole team a final written warning, or possibly dismiss the whole team, which will include innocent people. Is there any legal reason why we cannot use polygraph testing. It is not for prosecution purposes, but we do want to dismiss the person responsible.
Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  LondonlawyerJ replied 3 years ago.

LondonlawyerJ :

Hello, I am a solicitor with over 15 years experience. I will try to help you with this.

JACUSTOMER-jxwcjd3f- :

Thank you

LondonlawyerJ :

Unless there is something in the employment contract with the person you suspect you can not require him to take a polygraph test. Polygraph evidence is not used in English courts, it being considered unreliable. I guess that because you want to use this test there is not much direct evidence of this person's guilt.

LondonlawyerJ :

A final warning and then some vigilance of this person may be the best approach.

JACUSTOMER-jxwcjd3f- :

The money went from a safe in the security control room. Only security staff had access. Of a team of 12 people, only 6 had access to the safe on the given date. We do not wish to use the polygraph evidence in court, we just need to identify the culprit, so we can dismiss that person. The polygraph would be voluntary. Why would our HR not take the opportunity to identify the person. As for the other 5, whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty.

LondonlawyerJ :

You can't force anyone to take a polygraph and the results would have no legal significance so if you sack someone on the basis of a polygraph test you will risk a claim in the tribunal. As for the last comment well yes I agree that would be v harsh, sacking a whole team because of the wrong doing of one person.

JACUSTOMER-jxwcjd3f- :

All 6 have volunteered to take the polygraph, but obviously one person is bluffing, thinking we won't do it. If the employer dismissed all 6 security officers, would there then be a case for unfair dismissal.

LondonlawyerJ :

You are moving into a different area now. There might be a risk. But remember polygraph tests are not considered reliable evidence. Sack someone for failing the test or refusing to take such a test and you will very likely have a claim.