My friend intended to deliver some literature to a school and pulled up outside the school with the intention of pulling onto the premises. The gate was closed and she continued on her way.A few days later she received a PIN for parking on zig zag lines. She appealed against this but was told she could go to another appeals hearing and was sent reams of evidence. Among this evidence was a DVD which clearly showed her stopped fo just under 3 seconds. She appeared at the hearing and was told that 3 seconds is enough for the offence to be proved,
Thank you for your prompt reply. The only thing I need to clarify is that there is no pedestrian crossing, only the zig zags. I appreciate that this will probably not alter the logic or the decision.
Still seems unjust!