Hello my name is ***** ***** I will help you with this. Please note that I am a working Solicitor and may be on and offline as I have to attend Court and meet with clients, even at weekends. As such you may not get an instant response when you reply as this is not an ‘on demand’ live service, but rest assured I will be giving your question my immediate attention upon return. There is no need to wait here, you will get an email when I reply.
A copy of the Judgment can be found here:
Can I clarify anything for you about this today please?
I already have the judgement. What I am asking for is the response from the manager/director of the then British Waterways (now CRT) London division John Guest 9JG),who is recorded on the web in the public domain ,that special consideration needs to be made with regard to the vessel charging rules and bye-laws on this specific an unique stretch of the tidal Brent, as a result of this High court decision..the effect on the rest of us, (and I am next door neighbour to Nigel Moore and just as effected as he is ,being also a wharf owner). i saw this JG response when 'surfing the web' but cannot find it now.
Also, in para 18.4 of the judgement it suggests that the ownership of the bed of the river, being tidal, is vested in the Crown, and not CRT.is this correct /
You have rated poor service but asked for more information?
As for Para 18.4 - you are correct, the ownership of the bed is vested in the Crown
Does that clarify?