My issue is what relates to 'factual information'.
We have tested the products under specific European specifications, however they say that they test their products under different specifications, therefore, although our information is factual under one set of specifications, the results of our tests do differ from their own, and this may lead to misinterpretation.
We will be specifying the methods used in our articles, how we tested the products.
I am concerned there maybe grey areas due to the interpretation of the results relating to the different available methods of testing these particular types of products.
Are there any such instances, legal cases which we can refer to. I was hoping for more specific / detailed answers than this.