How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask UKSolicitorJA Your Own Question

UKSolicitorJA, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 4312
Experience:  English solicitor with over 12 years experience
Type Your Law Question Here...
UKSolicitorJA is online now

In "Gift of my personal possessions (not money)" the decease

Resolved Question:

In "Gift of my personal possessions (not money)" the deceased gifted "All my jewelry" (no ambiguity there I feel), but also "First choice of all furniture in the flat" to beneficiary A. Beneficiary A interprets this as believing that they are entitled to all contents of the dwelling fom chair to painting to antique. All the personal chattels of the deceased are contained within the dwelling, and the will itself states "It is my wish without imposing any legal obligation that my trustees shall deal with the gift made to them in accordance with any written directions I may give concerning it. It is also my wish that my trustees shall deal with any personal chattels for which there are no written directions as if they were part of my residuary estate". Beneficiaries B and C maintain that if all contents pass to A as "furniture" no personal chattels remain and they believe it was the intent of the deceased to give priority to A for general furniture and share other "heirlooms" as part of the residuary estate. Can you give any legal guideline and advice in interpretation?
Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  UKSolicitorJA replied 2 years ago.

Each Will is interpreted in accordance with what is written in it and the final decision lies with the courts. Lawyers like us can only give our opinion on what the interpretation should be but our opinions are not conclusive, as the final decision is of the court.

Here, it is clear that the deceased gives away all their jewellery to A. The deceased also gives A first choice of all furniture in the flat which in my opinion means that A is entitled to take whatever furniture is in the flat that A wishes to take.

However, the terms "furniture" and "jewellery" do not include personal chattels although personal chattels include furniture and jewellery.

So, all personal chattels, other than the furniture in the flat and the deceased's jewellery, are part of the deceased's residuary estate and do not automatically become A's.

Personal chattels are defined in the Administration of Estates Act 1925 as follows:

Personal chattels” mean carriages, horses, stable furniture and effects (not used for business purposes), motor cars and accessories (not used for business purposes), garden effects, domestic animals, plate, plated articles, linen, china, glass, books, pictures, prints, furniture, jewellery, articles of household or personal use or ornament, musical and scientific instruments and apparatus, wines, liquors and consumable stores, but do not include any chattels used at the death of the intestate for business purposes nor money or securities for money

Furniture usually means movable items such as tables, chairs, sofas, beds, cupboards etc. that make a dwelling habitable.

Jewellery includes personal ornaments such as necklaces, bracelets, heirlooms etc

May I help further?
UKSolicitorJA, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 4312
Experience: English solicitor with over 12 years experience
UKSolicitorJA and other Law Specialists are ready to help you

What Customers are Saying:

  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther

Meet The Experts:

  • Jo C.

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
< Last | Next >
  • Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
  • Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • Buachaill's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Barrister 17 years experience
  • Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry


    Satisfied Customers:

    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • UK_Lawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • Kasare's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • Joshua's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice