there is no more to the situation at the moment I just want to know as I have had this happen and need to understand if this correct
it shouldn't mater as if I have proof for my innocence then surely it should be looked into. in my experience of the police if you produce proof of your innocence they dismiss it even if it is indisputable and then later claim they look into all sides of the allegation
what is the legal status??
i had additional infomration to prove my innocenece but they were not interested in listerning to this and stated they had done a full investigation but they had not and are not willing to look at the additoinal evidence and i need to know what the legallity of this means? i probably didnt write my answer as best i could
I was involved in a motoring collision. I was riding my motorcycle when the van I was over taking swerved into me. The person in the van was known to me (my estranged son) and an altercation took place between us, third parties for each of us called the police but when they arrived they spoke to the van driver first and I was immediately arrested and later charged with criminal damage, assault and driving undue care and attention. On my release after my arrest when I collected my motorcycle I found damage to the side of it and had an engineers report carried out by my insurance company. I immediately contacted the police to inform them of this development they were not interested.
the engineers report proved that the van had come into contact with the motorcycle. where as the 3rd party claimed I kicked the van this evidence disproves the initial allegation
surely evidence to show that can prove your innocence irrelavant of the allegation should be looked into? regardless off the crime if there is evidence it should be looked into by the police so as to stop innocent people being wronged??