How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jo C. Your Own Question

Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 30929
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
12826847
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

My son was stopped for not wearing a seatbelt. He was exempt

Customer Question

My son was stopped for not wearing a seatbelt. He was exempt for wearing but did not have his certificate with him. Since he had not committed a criminal offence, he did not give his name to the police. He was taken to court, not for not giving his name, but for not wearing a seatbelt. When he attended the Magistrates Court, the case was dismissed as he produced his exemption certificate. The Magistrates asked him his name, and again he refused. My son applied Common Law which stipulates that, unless you have committed a criminal offence, i.e. doing tort to another individual, the Magistrates court does not have the power under Maritime Law, to 'do business with you'. If a defendant gives his name and details to the Magistrates Court, then he/she enters into a contract with the Court, hence is liable to comply with the rest of the session. As a result of not giving his name, my son received a fine of £360 which he refused to pay. He wrote to the Magistrates Court asking for the fine to be withdrawn as it had been given in his name which he had not given or uttered. He made it clear when he first attended the court that he did not wish to enter into a commercial lien with the court. This is Common Law which the Magistrates reject at all times. There have been cases where the police was called in the Court to arrest the defendant, but by explaining to the Police their rights under Common Law, the police arrested the Magistrates for being in breach of this Law and in several other cases, the case was dismissed. The Magistrates ignored my son's letters (2) asking the Magistrates to acknowledge the above, that he had not entered into contract with the court and hence the fine (which they addressed to HIS name which they had from other sources, was 'unlawful' and warned the magistrates (he addressed one letter to each of the magistrates with their names on the letter) that they could be done for purgery. No reply was received from the magistrates, instead they instructed a collection agency to collect the fine plus the agency's fees. My son did not open the door to the Bailliffs who attended and put a notice on the door to advise that should they return, they would be liable under Common Law and the respective text which ensues, which when displayed, deterrs the bailliffs. No further visits were made. Last week, the collection agency sent my son a letter informing him that the 'fine' had been returned to the Magistrates Court. Today a Notice of Enforcement arrived addressed to my son's full name with his address. This is from Marston High Court Enforcement Officers and Certificated Enforcement agents. The notice specifies the amount due, the details of the court judgement or order or ENFORCEMENT POWER BY VIRTUE OF WHICH THE DEBT IS ENFORCEABLE. The details are "A warrant has been issued by Her Majesties Courts & Tribunals Service. Driver of motor vehicle fail to give name/address". It is dated 26/03/2014. Furthermore if the fine is not paid by 25/11/14, the an enforcement agent will visit you.... and the usual procedure of seizing goods, etc... My son will not pay the fine, yet I am worried, as we are joint tenants but my son does not work but is not on benefits either. Although not an official carer, he has been looking after me and occasionally takes temporary work. He is not abusing the state by claiming benefits which he would be entitled to. I am concerned that if a bailliff gains access somehow if we leave a door open by accident, although temporarily, that MY belongings will be taken. I need your help, not as much as with a potential bailliffs's visit but more so with the corrupted Magistrates' decision which refused to withdraw the fine after imposing it in court, hence denying the Law of the Land of this country (Magna Carta). What can we do to expose the Magistrates?

Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Law

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Jo C.

    Jo C.

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    30316
    Over 5 years in practice
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/EM/emus/2015-7-7_192327_bigstockportraitofconfidentfemale.64x64.jpg Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    30316
    Over 5 years in practice
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BE/benjones/2015-12-1_0437_ennew.64x64.jpg Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    11553
    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BU/Buachaill/2012-5-25_211156_barrister5.64x64.jpg Buachaill's Avatar

    Buachaill

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    1754
    Barrister 17 years experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/JO/jojobi/2013-3-19_0265_maxlowryphoto.64x64.jpg Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry

    Advocate

    Satisfied Customers:

    894
    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/UK/UKLawyer/2012-4-12_9849_F2.64x64.jpg UK_Lawyer's Avatar

    UK_Lawyer

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    750
    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/KA/Kasare/kasare.64x64.jpg Kasare's Avatar

    Kasare

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    402
    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/OS/osh/2015-7-7_19268_gettyimagesb.64x64.jpg Joshua's Avatar

    Joshua

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8199
    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice