I have made several attempts to reply to no avail. This is the first time a 'reply window' appeared. Although the undernoted is my reply, with all due respect, my the legal questions assume that there is bad faith. Anyway the undernoted is my reply.
To put it simply, £3m of the £5m Claim relates to underpayments. The corresponding valuation was simply based on measurement from contract drawings and application of Bill rates to that measurement.
In 2007, following a 5 day legal debate, the Arbiter issued a Final Draft Opinion (FDO) dismissing the whole £5m Claim as irrelevant. To do so, with intent, he invented non-existent methodology issues relating to the valuation where he then said these methodologies were flawed and as such he declared the craves irrelevant. This was repeated throughout his dismissals of the various Craves. The Arbiter recently converted his FDO to a Part Award which he issued on 11 December 2014.
ThanksCustomer that's very good. The Company is insolvent though and I don't have the funds to instruct law agents so I have to do it though an assignation.
I have put together the summons, which could convert to a writ if I was to take it to the Edinburgh Sheriff Court. Is there any way you could look at the summons and advise me on their competency?