Dear Alex Thank you to reply me today However, after examining the information that you had referred me to, I felt that I should clarify for the following: the 3 letters arrive together on the same envelope 7/March 2012 two of them with different date of issue 16/01/2012 ,22/02/2012 and the solicitors lying about it the two letters was been posted on 16/01/2012, and 22/02/2012 How a Solicitor(s), can prove the letter was issued to his customer, if this no was posted by record delivery ? the solicitor(s) are obligated to create a record of the letters posted to : customer,(s) claimant, Defendant, etc if the letters is not posted by record delivery? if a customer received from his solicitor(s) example : on 7 March 2012 one envelope with 3 letters inside each of them with different date of issue 16 January 2012; 22 February and 7 March 2012 how can prove a customer he came on the possession of this 3 letters on 7 of March and not on the date 16 January 2012, 22 February 2012 , 7 March 2012 issue of each letter and the letter not was issued by recorded delivery how a customer can questioned his solicitor(s) to found the true? if a solicitor(s) not have any record of the letters was delivered ,sent ,posted how they make sure there's correspondence came to the right person ,right address ,right time and especially since it may contain confidential
please you can respond to me questions Thank you
1.I am very sorry but your response is not satisfactory what evidence I would give to a court considering that this not was send record delivery
you mentioned : Neither are they required to keep a copy of when they were posted. There may be a date on the file of when they were but it's not a requirement.
this is unlawful/breach of fundamental rights in accordance with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights the Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimumrights:(a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and indetail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;
why is not apply to the firm ? everyone must be treated equally under the law regardless of their race, gender, national origin, color, ethnicity, religion, disability, or other characteristics, without privilege, discrimination, or bias.
Equality before the law is one of the basic principles of liberalism
All are equal before the law.
The king must not be under man but under God and under the law
with all my respect who /what is the firm and who/what is the king ? if the king can be subject to the law
I am very sorry dear alex but I not happy with you response
what is the definition of law in your opinion
what is the definition of justice in your opinion
this is not a response
Dear Alex I want to terminate the conversation because I don't want to put you in any inconvenient situation Thank you very much and God bless you
If this answers your question could I invite you rate my answer before you leave today.
If the system won’t let you please click reply.
Please bookmark my profile if you wish for future help: http://www.justanswer.co.uk/law/expert-alexwatts/