1.The said heritable subjects being a family home in terms of section 40 of the bankruptcy scotland act 1985 and for the first and second defenders having refused to consent to the sale thereof, it is epdient that authority for the sale of the one half pro indiviso share of the said subjects which have been vested in the trustee of the debtor as first craved.
NEVER REFUSED SALE OF BEEN NO CONVERSATION ABUT SELLING
2.the pursuer being trustee on the sequestrated estate of the first named defender and the the trustee and second named defender being pro indiviso proprieters of the subjects, the pursuer is entitled to the division or sale of the subjects as second craved
3. The said heritable subjects being a family home in terms of section 40 of the bankruptcy scotland act 1985 and the first and second defenders having refused to cooperate in the marketing and sale thereof, it is expedient that authority to enter possession of the said subjects is granted as third craved
have never refused to cooperate never talked about selling
4. The pursuer being entiitled in the circumstances condescended upon to enter into possessions of the said subjects, and being further entitled to decree of ejection, decree should be granted as fourth craved.