they are saying it was bought by an innocent party that had no idea of the situation between the previous owner and the selling dealer
As far as they see it the camper should rightfully be mine as I have all the paperwork for it.
They cant beleive the insurance company has paid out on it as its not on file as a stolen vehicle
I paid 20k for it in total
10k in money plus traded in my motorcycle Worth 10k
so does that mean he has stolen my money and motorcycle
Or am I liable to loose the lot through trusting an outright criminal
Yes I do have possesion of the camper, its in storage for the winter
Does this mean I cant do anything with the camper ie sell it , this has been ongoing since July last year .
if I have completed a contract surely its my property, I even did a hpi check on it that come out as being all clear.
what more could I do.
I understand the innocent purchase bit ,but he had the van back with the owners concent to sell it on their behalf to enable him to refund the money back to them.
They have been paid by the insurance company , so how can they make claim it had been stolen from them knowing he was selling it with their consent.
Surely they have made a false claim against the insurers , they are the ones to be sued not me as they were aware it had been sold as it was put on the advert vehicle has now been sold , thats when they tried to get the money re funded.
It looks like the bigger the rogue the better it is with the answers I have got from you , these people have been paid 40k between them and now I may loose 20k for being the inocent party , where is the justice in that ??.