Prior to the FDR my initial offer was that I retain the property outright, I then reduced this on advice to 75/25% in my favour with no further claim on him. He replied with a 60/40 split in my favour with no costs, maintainance or claim on his pension. The judge recommended somewhere between the two. I came down again to 70/30 which they dismissed out of hand but then came back with 65/35 but again with no costs, claim to pension or maintenance. I could not manage on what they are offering. or else I would accept his offer if only to get closure as they has been going on for well over a year now.The bankruptcy thing is something he would do out of spite regardless of the consequences on him. How would this affect me and what do you think the outcome of the final hearing will be. It is likely that he will still not submit the required documents or make a full and honest disclosure as to assets.