this was first and final hearing judge felt satisfied with our evidence and granted an injunction. They have not provided evidence that they were away. Their legal representative was still able to obtain this claim form and application for injunction (if they were indeed away) but claimed that they recieved this after the hearing-judge allowed only 24 hours to serve notice followed by a hearing. I have evidence(video recording from my cctv) to confirm that they have trespassed repeatedly or sent agents onto my land without my permission in my absence.
I am concerned that they might request an application for this order to be set aside without a hearing in which case I may not have an opportunity to present evidence Thank you
served by posting through the letter box, the form allowed this form of serving and a video was taken. to show that I was posting the document through the letter box.
the judge was aware that it was posted through the letter box , this was ticked on the injunction application form. the defendants solicitor wrote the day after the hearing stating they are representing the defendants and that they have received the letter though the defendants have been away, someone has been checking their post, that they received it the day after the hearing and that the defendants were on holiday , therefore they will be applying for the order to be set aside
Thank you. The Defendants legal representative state that they have applied to the court for the injunction order to be set aside. They claim that the defendants were away at the time. The defendants will be providing witness statements. (They have asked for my consent which I presume should be before they make this application).
I do not wish to bear their costs for making this application at the same time do not wish to incur additional costs if the order will be set aside in case case if they provide evidence that were away.
What are my options?