yes she was found guilty and has a criminal record as a result, and since the DBS check they have now filed an attachment of earnings. i have managed to get a stay given we have a court date to reopen case. the biggest issue is the fact no one accepts responsibility and is will ing to provide the evidence.
The offence is for the non payment of rail fare. The exact extract from dbs check is : travelling on railway without paying fare on 4th May 2014 contrary to regulation of railway act 1889. S.5 (3)(A).
Can I ask....why would the DBS check return in first place for a conviction at an address that she did not live at since she was twelve...well in fact she never lived their as it was the house next door, not the actual address So she has never been linked to that address ? Her mother who lost custody of her when she was 12 and has only seen her 5 times in 14 years lives at the address next to the one used. Surely this is identity theft is that not a crime ? The last point is surely the rail investigations Ltd who investigated it should have taken proper steps to verify her identity ?