How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Ash Your Own Question

Ash, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 10914
Experience:  Solicitor with 5+ years experience
Type Your Law Question Here...
Ash is online now

I buy green coffee which is sold in situ at a warehouse. Once

Customer Question

I buy green coffee which is sold in situ at a warehouse. Once we have purchased it the coffee is "released" to my company and WE become the legal owner of the coffee. Some coffees we arrange to be delivered straight away, whilst others remain at the warehouse and we pay a rent to keep them there. I arrange for transport of this coffee to my business premises. The Warehouse, my premises and the coffee supplier are all in England.
When I want to take delivery of the coffee, I email a "release" which details what coffee I require transporting to the carrier, and the carrier rings the warehouse with details of what they want to collect on my behalf.
When the carrier collects the coffee their driver signs a loading note which details what coffee has been loaded onto their lorry. This is then used as a delivery note so we can check what we got and as the basis of invoicing our delivery by the transport company.
In February we released 165 sacks of coffee to the transport company who collected it as normal. However, they also signed for 15 sacks (900kg) of a particularly expensive coffee worth about £4500 which we had not requested, and which they claim they had not requested by from the warehouse. The transport company claim they did not receive this and the warehouse are adamant that they did. The transport company did not query this at the time. When we received the delivery we received 165 sacks of coffee, as expected, and were invoiced for hauling 165 sacks of coffee as expected. Because we got what we expected we were not aware of the additional 15 sacks until this month when we tried to release them for our transporter. The warehouse said they had already been dispatched.
So my questions are:
1) Do you think the transport company's driver's signature for taking delivery of the missing sacks is enough to transfer responsibility for the missing coffee from the warehouse to the transport company? They are currently saying that they are not responsible as they did not take delivery.
2) If the answer to 1 is yes, the transport company say they transport subject to the RHA Conditions of Carriage 2009. This would limit their liability to £1170 (i.e. £1300 per tonne with the lost coffee weighing 900kg). However, non of the directors or staff of my company have ever signed such conditions but their invoices do say "All goods carried under the R.H.A. Conditions of Carriage 2009". This is not the first invoice with them but non of us have ever noticed it or had this pointed out to us. Are we bound by this limitation?
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Ash replied 1 year ago.
Hello my name is ***** ***** I will help you with this.
What is the value of the loss? Was it insured?
Customer: replied 1 year ago.


The loss is £4500 and it is not insured as it has not been subject to the specific insured peril.



Expert:  Ash replied 1 year ago.
Just to be clear, there is a signature saying it has been collected by transport co?
Ash, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 10914
Experience: Solicitor with 5+ years experience
Ash and other Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Hello yes there is.

I have attached a copy. It is the first item, 15 bags of Yirgacheffe

Attachment: 2015-04-29_145342_pod_for_5th_february_2015.pdf

Expert:  Ash replied 1 year ago.
Calling now!

What Customers are Saying:

  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther

Meet The Experts:

  • Jo C.

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
< Last | Next >
  • Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice
  • Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • Buachaill's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Barrister 17 years experience
  • Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry


    Satisfied Customers:

    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • UK_Lawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • Kasare's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • Joshua's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice