good to talk to you again...
in my poc i have explained a particular date to the defendant i.e an email i received indicating when i would have had knowledge of an event which in effect gave me 3 years from date of knowledge. what i don't understand is that in their background of their witness statement for their strike out application they even confirm the above date yet when it comes to their limitation argument they infer i haven't pleaded knowledge of that fact . what should i reply?
yes thanks. there is just the one issue which i am trying to resolve. please let me know if i need to start a new question, it is one i have asked you before and you sent me some links but i am still in the dark and that is the calculation of the 3 years limitation clock for issuing a claim. one of the links you sent me states that if the knowledge started on say the 15th then the clock starts on the follwing day therefore if i brought proceedings exactly on the 15th 3 years later then i am within time. i would be grateful if you could finally put this one to bed and also where would i find the precise wording for the calculation? i have spent days trying to find out the actual rules for the calculation!!!!
thanks for that one final point in my defence for the strike out is it best to keep my reply short and succinct as opposed to repeating what i have said in my letter before claim and my poc