No. My insurers seem very ready to leave it as a fault claim against me. To the best of my knowledge nothing has been recovered from the shop.
Ideally I want them to accept responsibility and pay out to my insurance company.
What do you mean?
It's not as simple as that. As already stated it currently stands as a fault claim, so not only have I had to replace my car and the insurers have paid less than the replacement one cost, but as a fault claim my current year's insurance is costing me more.
My questions are in my original submission. Please refer back.
The company should have maintained their trees. If they had the incident would not have occurred. Therefore I would not have a fault claim against me, and i would not have had to supplement the insurance payout to buy an identical car of same age.