I dont know. The car is a Jaguar E type and he might be claiming that that is the value of the car now. Total cost to him was 80k he is saying he will only accept a refund of 100k
I don't think I am. When I quoted for the job, it was way underpriced and it probably cost me around 15 to 20k to complete. Market value of the car is around 80k and I thought under SOGA that if I offered a full refund, I would be doing all I should legally.
The breach is obviously debateable but I don;t have the time or energy to fight it. Could he state that as the car (in his view) is worth more now than the (cheap) restoration cost and would that constitute a consequential loss?