How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Thomas Judge Your Own Question

Thomas Judge
Thomas Judge, Lawyer
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 32885
Experience:  Over 25 years experience in law
27487359
Type Your Law Question Here...
Thomas Judge is online now

I have been in conflict with my freeholders since 2011 when

Resolved Question:

I have been in conflict with my freeholders since 2011 when their gardeners destroyed substantial dense foliage in my garden which formed along with railings the boundary between my flat and a busy public alleyway resulting in a severe loss of privacy and security to which the freeholders admitted. They took absolutely no steps to rectify this and eventually I suspended service charges payments. Whilst this breached the lease from my side, they in turn were also in breach of the lease. 2 years later the matter went before the County Court where I acted in person. . I argued that I should be compensated for the loss of privacy and security. The lady District Judge dismissed the case immediately on the grounds that in my written defence I had stated that the claimants had been “wilfully negligent” but whilst they had been negligent they had not been “wilfully” so, and I ought to have got my pleadings right. Case dismissed. Frankly I don’t believe that those acting in person should be dealt with in this way. In 2013 a second issue affecting my enjoyment of the flat emerged. The leaseholder immediately above me had installed laminated wooden flooring in her flat for which she required written permission from the freeholders but she had not laid any acoustic underlay and the resulting noise nuisance was intolerable. Matters repeated themselves : to the head of the Management Agents I sent e-mails, recorded delivery letters and unanswered phone calls to his office requesting the acoustic specifications. When after several months there were no replies I reported this to their solicitors who astonishingly refused to let me have the identities of the 12 directors of the freeholders’ company. I did discover one director called Eddington who undertook to report the matter to the directors at their next meeting, but nothing resulted from this. Again I have to say I felt let down by the bench. There were 3 preliminary hearings before separate judges : 1] the first bad-temperedly asked me if I was making a counterclaim or seeking compensation and when I said I couldn’t quite grasp the distinction. Then he said how on earth was he expected to work out what compensation there should be. Then why was I going after the freeholders when it was the leaseholder above making the noise. I said this required looking at the lease. Basically the Judge said we didn’t have time for all that and ordered me to send to the court a submission to show the freeholders were responsible. 2] Judge 2 was amazingly frank and told myself and their solicitor that Judge 1 had been talking a lot of gibberish, an expression he used several times. The freeholders over 4 years had not once addressed two serious issues involving noise nuisance and loss of privacy and security. It was, he stated, a hopeless failure to perform and criticised them for having turned down the mediation process. 3 : District Judge 3 was brusque coming on rude. The heart of the matter was that I could show that in the lease there was a landlord enforcement covenant in operation which obliged the freeholders to take action upon being made aware of a complaint which they had not done. But not once in the hearing did Judge 3 make any judgement on the merits or otherwise of my submission. He concerned himself only with making hostile petty points against me which smacked heavily that he had improperly pre-judged the case, for example : • As I said above I had exchanged correspondence with Eddington which proved feckless. The Judge said that I ought to have addressed the Directors of the claimant company at their registered address, and by not doing so my case was thereby wanting. The claimants had refused to reveal to me when exactly the new regulation/covenant stating that leaseholders required written authority. So the Judge encouraged by the solicitor said that there was no proof as to when the new regulation/covenant came into force and there was therefore no proof that my claim did not fall foul of the Limitation Act. • His final jibe was that I had not quantified a quantum of compensation or counterclaim. I had been ordered to answer the question as to why I believed that the freeholders should be accountable and not the errant leaseholder. This would have been a matter raised in a final hearing. It should not have been raised in a preliminary hearing. On these bases he set aside my counterclaim. I question this without the landlord enforcement covenant being considered. He set aside my counterclaim and gave costs of £1800 to the claimants and said if I wanted to take matters further it was open to me to take a case against them. The main question I would like to put to you is whether I should be advised to take a case against them or not. I would appreciate your advice. JEREMY XXXX

Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Nicola-mod replied 1 year ago.
Hello,
I've been working hard to find a Professional to assist you with your question, but sometimes finding the right Professional can take a little longer than expected.
I wonder whether you're ok with continuing to wait for an answer. If you are, please let me know and I will continue my search. If not, feel free to let me know and I will cancel this question for you.
Thank you!
Nicola
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Well I am very anxious to get an answer, so will hang on hoping it may not be too long. Regards, Jeremy

Expert:  Nicola-mod replied 1 year ago.
Hello,
We will continue to look for a Professional to assist you.
Thank you for your patience,
Nicola
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Dear Nicola, Thank you for your reply re continuing to look for someone else to assist me. Does that mean that that person will not be you? do I need to send any further information from my end? I only ask because I had to omit some salient matters to fit into the length of words allowed in the question. Regards, Jeremy

Expert:  Nicola-mod replied 1 year ago.
Hello,
We will continue to look for a Professional to assist you. I am a moderator for the topic and not a Professional myself. No further information is needed at this time.
Thank you for your patience,
Nicola
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

I am getting a bit anxious about progress..... Any news? Jeremy

Expert:  Nicola-mod replied 1 year ago.
Hello,
I apologise as we have not yet been able to find a Professional to assist you. Do you wish for me to continue to search for someone to assist you or would you like for us to close your question at this time?
Thank you for your patience,
Nicola
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Well, unless you are confident that you could find somebody in the next 7 days I think there may be case for closure. Jeremy

Expert:  Nicola-mod replied 1 year ago.
Hello Jeremy,
I am happy to keep the question for the time being, but I have to be honest and say I am not confident of finding a Professional to answer at this stage.
Please let me know how you'd like to proceed,
Nicola
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Perhaps I could assist if I cut my question to a barest minimum - I am questioning the conduct of 2 District Judges when I was acting in person.

1] my freeholders’ gardeners remove negligently dense foliage which formed the boundary between my garden flat and a busy public alleyway causing, at the freeholders’ own admission, serious compromise to my privacy and security. They fail to make any rectification. After two years I suspend payments of service charges. The matter goes to Court and I plead that the freeholders had been wilfully negligent. The District Judge immediately throws the case out on the grounds that they had certainly been negligent, but not wilfully negligent. I ask her to make an order that they rectify the damage, which she refuses.

2] A further two years go by and the freeholders repeat yet further damage. Again the matter goes to Court. This time the Judge says the issue has already gone to Court and finds against me. I say that this is a new and separate incidence of damage and it should be adjudged as such, otherwise the Judge is giving open license for ever to the freeholders neither to rectify the damage or fear the consequences of further damage.

3] There is further conflict with the same freeholders : the leaseholder immediately above me had installed laminated wooden flooring in her flat for which she required written permission from the freeholders and the resulting noise nuisance was intolerable. The freeholders would not send me the acoustic specification they required. Again I suspended payments of service charges and lodged a counterclaim. At a preliminary hear I was ordered to send to the court a submission explaining why I was going after the freeholders and not the leaseholder above. The heart of the matter was that I could show that in the lease there was a landlord enforcement covenant in operation which obliged the freeholders to take action upon being made aware of a complaint which they had not done even after a year since my complaint. The second hearing was also a preliminary and with a different judge. I was expecting to be able to cross-examine the claimants, buut only an agency solicitor appeared for them and effectively the judge did not listen to the landlord enforcement covenant case. Instead he nit-picked : I had written to one of the directors of the freeholders whilst I should have sent it to their registered office, and secondly as it was not known when the errant leaseholder had had the flooring installed I could have been out of time per the Limitation Act. He gave judgement to the claimants and struck out my counterclaim and ordered me to pay costs. Should there not have been a final hearing.

What do you recommend I should do on these matters? JEREMY WATT

Expert:  Nicola-mod replied 1 year ago.
Hello,
We will continue to look for a Professional to assist you.
Thank you for your patience,
Nicola
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

I think we should call it a day now. Perhaps you could return the £38 fee. regards, *****

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Relist: I still need help.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

It seems clear now that I am not going to get an answer to my original question. Could I get my £38 worth by asking a much simpler question on behalf of a friend of mine. He has had an acrimonious divorce some years ago and his ex-wife is now refusing to tell him of the whereabouts of their daughter who has moved out of England. What legal recourse might he usefully take? Final regards,

**** Watt

Expert:  Thomas Judge replied 1 year ago.
Hi Jeremy, Let me see if I can help for you in this regard. Your friend is entitled to see his child and if the ex is refusing to allow this to happen then he should make an application to the court. You have stated that he does not know where she is. He can apply to the court for details of the ex from the department of work and pensions. He should make his original application for a child arrangement order on form C100 - and an application for the child's whereabouts (http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/c004-eng.pdf)Follow these steps to apply for a court order.Read the guidance - http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/cb001-eng.pdfFill in the C100Send it to your nearest courtIt costs £215 to apply for a court order. I hope that this helps. Please rate positively and happy to answer any additional questions
Thomas Judge, Lawyer
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 32885
Experience: Over 25 years experience in law
Thomas Judge and 3 other Law Specialists are ready to help you

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Jo C.

    Jo C.

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    30316
    Over 5 years in practice
< Previous | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/EM/emus/2015-7-7_192327_bigstockportraitofconfidentfemale.64x64.jpg Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    30316
    Over 5 years in practice
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BE/benjones/2015-12-1_0437_ennew.64x64.jpg Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    11553
    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BU/Buachaill/2012-5-25_211156_barrister5.64x64.jpg Buachaill's Avatar

    Buachaill

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    1754
    Barrister 17 years experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/JO/jojobi/2013-3-19_0265_maxlowryphoto.64x64.jpg Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry

    Advocate

    Satisfied Customers:

    894
    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/UK/UKLawyer/2012-4-12_9849_F2.64x64.jpg UK_Lawyer's Avatar

    UK_Lawyer

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    750
    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/KA/Kasare/kasare.64x64.jpg Kasare's Avatar

    Kasare

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    402
    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/OS/osh/2015-7-7_19268_gettyimagesb.64x64.jpg Joshua's Avatar

    Joshua

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8199
    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice