Hello, and thank you for responding. I have had to ask the prisoner's wife for details and this is what she has said:
'I have just spoken to ***** and he is going to write all the conflicting stuff out and send it to me ASAP. If he sends it on Monday I should have it by Wednesday, or Thursday at the latest. I know of quite a bit but not everything. ***** has been finding more when he cross-references statements. Each statement on its own sounds fine (mostly, but even within statements from the same person there are inconsistencies) but when you look at 2 different ones describing the same thing there are glaring discrepancies. Some, the police might not have noticed, others they ignored, and yet others were changed when it came to what the people said in court. Likewise, if there was going to be evidence against something said in a statement then the witness who had said it in their statement just wasn’t asked that in court, so they didn’t have to lie on the witness stand'.
She thinks it might be Thursday next when she receives the full dossier. So may I get in touch then and send you the full details?
Well, we'll see what the issues are. I cannot believe that an inconsistency, or several inconsistencies, which were not aired at the trial, should become irrelevant over time. They surely prove that somebody wasn't sure of their story. But don't bother to reply to this. If I may, I'll get back to you when we see exactly what the issues are. Thank you
Ok, we'll see. He is working on it! Please bear with us!
Hello. I'm sorry I cannot rate your service yet my question hasn't yet been answered. We have to see if the convicted person can give us some examples of the conflicting evidence so that you can tell us if it is worth pursuing. My actual question was: 'can a convicted person who knows he is innocent go to appeal if he is penniless?'. As you asked the question: 'what are the grounds?', I have gone down the route of asking him to respond to this. As he is on 'basic' at present, (another story, but let's leave that one for now) he cannot use internet and his evidence will have to be posted to his wife in Spain and she will email me when she receives it. I am trying to respond to the question you asked, but as I am only an intermediate (a friend who has enough funds to pay 'Just Answer'), it is a little complicated. Are you able to wait until we have the answer to the question you asked?
Just want I wanted to hear. Thanks so much Jo. Much appreciated. And I'll get back when I have the information we need. My name is ***** ***** the way. N
The service is now saying that you have answered my question and I haven't even asked it yet because you asked for more info. I now have that info, but because I only have one question, I want it to be the right one. You and I both agreed that we could wait until we had the information we need. What you don't know is that he has to send all info by mail from Spain and then his wife has to copy it to forward to me electronically. I am digesting all this gradually, but do have other things to do! So I hope you will be able to keep the channels open until I have formulated the question and you have answered it. Are you OK with this?
OK, we'll ignore what they are saying. I'll continue this vast amount of information we have been sent and get back to you as soon as I can. Nikky