Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
The work was done 8 months ago. The seller was under an obligation to fix the roof - which i believe would be dischared by them employing the roofer to complete the job. If the work done was defective then I dont see how I can argue that the seller did not fulfil their obligtaion to satisfy the condition and therfore any redress, if possible, would be against the roofer as it is their servcies which have been provided without due care and skill in breach of the sale and goods and servcies act. The roofer states that their work is guaranteed but this is an informal arrangement and isn't documented - is there any scope for argument that this can be/has passed to me?