It's ok now the courts have adjourned the final hearing, but I am very concerned about the case.
I have submitted a C2 application back to court on the grounds of the following.
1) A finding of fact was ruled out the 03.11.2014 by a district judge he believed their was no grounds for domestic violence against the defendant considering the evidence.
2) He also ruled a medical expert report, again no grounds to support the defendants claims.
He suggested 4 sessions of supervised contact on the grounds i had not see my daughter for 1 year. The first session went very well but then child was very tired during the 3 sessions. I suggested different times to the centre but they did not change them. The observation notes were missing information, and there was various changes to the observations notes. These notes have not been supplied to the court but only discovered two weeks ago in the SARS information.
I requested SARS information from CAFCASS,and core assets and made some disturbing discoveries.
1) CAFCASS had passed over notes to core assets prior to the contact sessions commencing that contain scott schedule allegations that had been ruled out on the 03.11.2015. This is surely a breach to article 6 rights Human rights rights to fair trial.
2) CAFCASS had passed notes to core assets in relation to mental health being a problem with my contact even though my GP supplied a statement to the court saying there is absolutely nothing in my records to stated i am any danger and the courts ruled it out anyway!!. My doctor has commented on the notes being passed to core assets as shocking and the court have a duty of care to investigate.(They haven't)
In the SARS request that i asked for their are email exchanges from core assets to CAFCASS involving third parties that bear no relevance to child contact. These emails state my qualifications are bluff and making various accusations. I have only met these people on 4 occasions.
My background is that i am child counsellor and former chair of governors of primary school. My qualifications are certainly not bluff that is for sure. My partner of 1 year and 5 months is teacher and is fuming.
I have no criminal convictions, charges or offences and i have not seen my daughter for 21 months to date. I mentioned my concerns to the judge about my discoveries with regards ***** ***** attacks and providing false and misleading information and he stated i would need to apply to court of appeal.
He offered no more contact sessions and has delayed the case for another 3 months because the CAFCASS involved is off sick so cannot be investigated at this stage.
The defence now supported by a barrister and i am litigant has stated that my former does not want me to have contact. I stated i have been assessed on 1 hour and 35 minutes of contact but what apears to be corruption involved.
He has indicated a possible family assisted order at the final hearing.
I have an older daughter who is now ten that i has live me twice a week for 7 years so i cannot understand the logic to this it is just ridiculous.
I believe it is very clear that for ever reason CAFCASS have stirred the pot so to speak" and the defence is taking advantage of being unrepresented.
Any guidance please in this matter