South Yorkshire Police
The allegation (as portrayed by the police was that the accuser says I scratched his car there was no witness to the event and no cctv coverage the police have arrested me and kept me detained for 5hrs released me
I took the to Court because they wouldn't release the cctv footage of the charge room. I did that because they were trying to hussle me into signing a confession which is on the cctv. I later discovered a witness who say the disagreement I had had with the accuser who witness his verbal threats to me and me driving away . he also say the accusers passenger who it turns out was one of the police officer who arrested me.
I was arrested on suspicion of criminal damage to the accusers car the allegation was dropped, when I took the police to Court over disclosure of the CCTV It was also shown that the evidence the police had produced to support my arrest on suspicion was MANUFACTURED. The police have not admitted to the officer being the accusers passenger and the officer didn't give a statement or admit to being in the Car. The took place in a shopping centre called Meadowhall their security staff disassociate themselves with what the police had done. Oh if it matters I'm in my 70's and during the "arrest" the Officers admitted using martial aid pressure point techneques on me. There are no charges of any discription against me. Though I do wish to collate information to sue.
No - Police making further inquiries- dont know what- never found out - but the information that I eventually got from Meadowhall security and under Subject Access Request to the police - enverything was dated prior to my arrest. in truth all they had was the accuser saying he turned and saw me standing by his car which it eventually turned out was 100yds away behind 600 cars he described me as in my fifties with blonde hair and glasses his passenger the female police office in her statement describes me as in my fifties with bleached blonde hair and glasses. The police have admitted destroying my fingerprints and DNA records.as requested Went I went to court for disclosure of of the cctv (small clams) the police had there a barrister, the senior police solicitor and the police compliance officer. and lost with costs.
When I was arrested I was brutalized I had bruising to my ribs , bruising to my wrists wrists where the handcuff had been and I later discovered I had a detached retina. Their was two officers who arrested me, one , the woman ive told you about the other was a man of 18 stone -- what is my ultimate wish - to sue the police if possible - to sue the accuser if possible.
What about this:
If I put a SAR for disclosure on the grounds that thee is a proma facea case that there has been collusion between the female police officer( who is stationed at Meadowhall) and the accuser. I appreciate they will both deny it But the police officer can't resist putting every thing on face book - all her friends and workmates. once I know him if he is on face book I can tie the two together, The police will almost certainly refuse to divulge information under section 7.4 I can the apply to the court for a Judge to view the information DPA 15.2 and ask him to consider releasing the information under section 35.2(b)
as a final request does this sound feasible.